Just because this movie was shot a long time ago doesn't mean it's worthless. In fact, in many cases, these films could be combined with the films available at the time and could accomplish amazing work. Anything that lacks special effects has suspense and the right timing to make up for it. There are many reasons, some of which are considered classics, and remakes are just a false attempt to make these films more popular, but ultimately ruin them with an absolute lack of actual soul.
<h2 class= "pgc-h-arrow-right" >1. Horrors, 1960 and 1998</h2>
Alfred Hitchcock's 1960s Horror is considered a classic. It's black and white, not very flashy, but still thrilling to watch. The 1998 version was essentially a remake of sheets, but there were more colors and spots, which made viewers wonder if it was necessary to introduce a new story. 1。 Horrors, 1960 and 1998
<h2 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" >2. Arthur 1981 vs 2011</h2>
If you've seen Arthur's original film, you don't actually need to watch the 2011 movie that was remade with Russell Brand. Although for him it feels natural for the character to be spoiled, in modern times it seems somewhat boring and predictable.
<h2 class= "pgc-h-arrow-right" >3. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 1990s vs 2014</h2>
Most of us watch Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles or watch manga on TV, so making a movie is definitely a high-risk thing. When fans are so loyal and nostalgic, it's hard to please them.
<h2 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" >4</h2>
Once a terrifying story of a man who kills people and covers them with a layer of wax to make an incredibly realistic wax figure, it was later transformed into a cheap machete by Paris Hilton as a supporting character. Disappointing to say the least.
<h2 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" >5</h2>
Martin Scorsese once said that 1963's The Haunted House was one of his favorite horror films, and the film was recognized as one of the best horror films of all time. But in contrast, the 1999 remake of Liam Neeson, Catherine Zeta Jones and Owen Wilson was ridiculous. The special effects are poor, there are too many clichés, and Irving Wilson's performance is too poor to watch.
<h2 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" >6</h2>
The 1973 British horror film starring the late Christopher Lee was hailed as a classic, but the 2006 remake with Nicholas Cage became a meme. It's okay to love or hate Nicolas Cage and his movie, but the movie is ridiculous, so it's more of a comedy than a horror movie.
<h2 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" >7</h2>
It's hard to believe that such a perfect childhood classic was recreated with everyone's favorite Emma Watson and all available CGI graphics, but didn't reach the original version. It seems silly when Emma is the only person in the movie surrounded by many CGI. It is forged, more incredible than the original film, and it is difficult to pause the audience's suspicions during the filming of the film.
<h2 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" >8. Robot Wars 1987 vs 2014</h2>
We don't know if the people doing the remake knew that, but all the fans of the original Robocop loved the movie because the Robocop was really a little bit bad and didn't take it seriously. But the smoothness and seriousness of the remake ruins the film's sense of humor and overall feel.
<h2 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" >9. Total recalls in 1990 and 2012</h2>
This original film is a great sci-fi movie in history, filled with Arnold Schwarzenegger on Mars. However, the remake did not meet the goal at all. First of all, why isn't the movie Ani? I mean Colin Farrell is great, but he can't replace Arnie. Coupled with the fact that there were no fools in the remake, it was a loss. All in all, they made an unforgettable action movie.