According to a report by the Taiwan Strait Network on May 30, former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd recently made a proposal on how to deal with Australia-China relations, saying that when dealing with China's growing economic and geopolitical influence, it is still necessary to "hold a group" with other countries to advance and retreat, otherwise there is a risk of being singled out by China and punished separately. He warned the Morrison administration not to single out China, or it would be "shot in the head."
Rudd's remarks are nothing more than Australia's constant provocations against China and is strongly opposed by "hindsight." Rudd's move will have no practical effect on easing the Current China-Australia relationship that has fallen to a freezing point, but will further stimulate China's punishment of Australia.
In fact, Australia's anti-China approach is not "single-handed", and the country's politicians do not have the guts at all. As a third-rate country, its limited national comprehensive strength determines that Turkey and Macao do not have the confidence and the ability to hold high the anti-China banner alone, and at best they can only act as a running dog of the United States.
It is useless to provoke China's core interests and who Australia and who to hold together. In recent years, when China has safeguarded its core interests, it has not only "beaten the dog without looking at the owner", but also dared to "beat the owner to show the dog". Owners dare to fight, let alone a dog?
In recent years, Australia has actively participated in the anti-China plan of the United States, becoming the most active member of the anti-China small circle of the "four-country mechanism" between the United States, Japan, India and Australia, and doing many bad things that Chinese hate. For example, vigorously suppressing 5G enterprises that exclude China, setting up obstacles to the "Belt and Road" initiative, smearing China's foreign investment as an "investment trap", actively providing funds for activities of Hong Kong rioters and serving as a shelter for them, creating various rumors and slandering china in order to blacken and exaggerate China, and flaunting its might in the South China Sea under the banner of "free navigation"...
For The country of Australia, individuals have nothing but incomprehensible hate. Their anti-China campaign runs completely counter to their national interests and is simply to please Washington. Yesterday, when I talked about Turkey in a related article, I believed that although this country is not very liked by almost all the big countries, it is still worthy of respect in many cases. Because all his decisions are from the perspective of maintaining and expanding his national interests, independent and logical. Including blocking Varyag that year, but just asking for money. He does this to China, and it does the same to the United States and Russia. Australia, on the other hand, has made huge profits from China's huge market that is unconditionally open, but he is willing to become an anti-China pawn of the United States when there is no conflict of interest between China and Australia.
In recent years, a variety of products, including red wine, timber, coal, copper, etc., have withdrawn from the Chinese market, and even a bunch of fresh grapes in Australia are difficult to find in China. A few days ago, the National Development and Reform Commission has issued a series of heavy policies on the domestic and foreign development of iron ore, which shows the determination to get rid of the dependence of iron ore on Australia.
In the face of the Morrison administration's anti-China and increasingly economic difficulties for Australia, Rudd, as an important figure in the opposition, is naturally anxious and uneasy, and in early this month he issued an article attacking the Morrison administration's "irresponsible and childish performance" on the Taiwan Strait issue, saying that the Australian government would do well to maneuver between China and the United States in order to win Australia's greatest geopolitical interests.
This time, Rudd once again spoke out about how to deal with China's moves, but the essence of these tricks is at best a tactical consideration. The decisive force is in the hands of Chinese, is Australia struggling like this? With China's various policies gradually taking effect, Australia's uncomfortable days are still ahead!
In the face of absolute strength, Rudd's move is nothing more than wishful thinking.