The issue of marital property division of cross-border property purchase (investment) caused by Wang Baoqiang's marriage change

Huaju Global Real Estate Network reported on the 19th: Recently, Wang Baoqiang released a divorce statement on his Sina Weibo saying that his wife Ma Rong cheated on former agent Song Zhe, saying that he could not tolerate malicious betrayal of marriage and destruction of the family. Wang Baoqiang's marriage change began to continue to ferment on the Internet.

If either of the Kings and Horses had ever owned a business in New Zealand, made an investment, or held a New Zealand resident visa, then their property distribution would not be so simple!

Mr. Wang Junzun of the Royal New Zealand Law Firm explains the differences between China and New Zealand in the division of marital property in marriage, property purchase and investment.

New Zealand's home purchase and investment will not be restricted by Chinese law

If Wang Ma had bought property or invested in business here when he was visiting New Zealand, the division of this part of the property would not be restricted by Chinese law, but would need to follow New Zealand law.

【Law on confrontation two】Splitting legs during marriage does not affect guardianship

Although most fans are one-sidedly distressed that the baby has been split, in New Zealand law, she will not be deprived of custody of the child because of her extramarital affair.

Even if you split your legs, you can take the same property and alimony

Unlike the domestic legal provisions that divorce is like a business breakup and whoever buys the house belongs to whomever buys the house, New Zealand law does not favor the man in the division of property because the money is earned by the man.

Impact on property division

In the same case in New Zealand, the woman can not only take half of the marital joint property, but also apply for additional alimony if the living finances are reduced to ensure that her quality of life will not be reduced.

The equity of the company belongs to the property after marriage and also needs to be divided according to law

Judging from the content exposed by the Internet, Wang Baoqiang has changed his company's equity many times, but the equity change does not affect the division of property, whether it is Wang Baoqiang's equity or Ma Rong's equity, it is the joint property of husband and wife, and should be divided according to law in the event of divorce.

【Law on confrontation five】If you suspect that there is a change in property before divorce, you can apply for retrospective

If Wang has evidence that his joint property with the horse was transferred to the Song – there is legal evidence that "the horse has been in charge of the Song for a long time", or that the horse investment failed, or was consumed through gambling, horse racing, drug purchases, etc. In this way, this part of the property can be deducted when dividing the property.

【Legal pairing 6】Cohabitation relationship of more than 3 years is a de facto marriage

Unlike the Chinese marriage law, which recognizes only a paper contract and no extramarital affair is considered a marriage, New Zealand recognizes de facto marriage. As long as there is evidence that Ma Rong and Song Zhe have lived together for more than 3 years - such as living in an apartment for a long time, having a common account, a career, etc... In New Zealand, their affair is considered a de facto marriage.

Effects on marital relationships

This becomes a relationship between two men and women coexisting at the same time. In New Zealand law, because of the recognition of two co-existing marriages at the same time, the situation becomes more complicated when it comes to break-up and property division, not just the domestic 50 or 50 one-size-fits-all.

If Wang Ma divorced, Song would not be willing to continue walking with Ma. Song also has the right to divide the property that Ma got after his divorce from Wang!!

Tips:

After obtaining the property on the divorce agreement, such property is a legal source of funds, which is particularly suitable for proof of the source of funds for investment immigration.