
In the era when traffic is king, many self-media always try to be opportunistic in the selection of materials in order to attract attention, such as in the field of fashion wear, simply matching a set of beautiful clothes for girls has long been unable to break out of the siege in many collocation pictures.
So there began to be a variety of more curious collocation themes, such as "teach you not to wear a month without repeating", "how to only spend half the price to buy ZARA, H&M, Uniqlo clothes"...
The former is well understood, that is, sharing a large number of dressing combinations at one time, and the latter is to guide the purchase of fast fashion children's clothing styles, thereby eliminating the difference between adult clothing and children's clothing.
The price of various hunting materials is the huge cost of purchasing clothes for collocation. Many bloggers play a little clever way to avoid this batch of fees: 1. After buying clothes in large quantities online to try on, they use a treasure seven days without reason to return the money; 2. All collocations are completed in the fitting rooms of major fashion stores.
The former is clearly morally criticized, while the latter will have the consequences of this UNIQLO incident.
Some views believe that the existence of the fitting room itself is to reserve consideration space for the purchase behavior, and if you try it, you can buy it, and no one can stop it if you don't buy it. It seems reasonable, but in fact it is a rogue.
Yes, trying on is not a kind of overlord agreement to buy when you wear it, and the old saying also says: it is okay to try it. But there is another word, sincerely make a deal.
The original intention of the try-on behavior should be simple and sincere, "like", "feel suitable", "want to buy" and so on can become the original intention of trying on. "In order to take pictures", "increase fans", "impossible to buy" from the beginning gave the original intention of trying on the behavior complex or even negative. Under this original intention, deliberately trying on clothes that do not match their size can be said to be subjective malice, because from the beginning, they did not intend to buy, and did not intend to be responsible for their own try-on behavior.
In this era when traffic is king, many people ignore morality and blindly pursue clicks, turning themselves into a trapped beast in the Internet world. Self-media people with the help of the rapid popularity of the Internet, through the rapid spread of social media a large number of large-scale real estate of their own ideas, while the Internet celebrities racked their brains to constantly refresh their own results, the audience's demand also continued to expand with the explosion of information. As long as the public's demand for content diversity is not stopped, the greater the possibility of self-media pursuing curiosity.
So in some ways, the internet is moving a little too fast. This is more test of Internet people in the fast-paced pace of operation to let the heart slow down and precipitate themselves, do high-quality content rather than win with curiosity. Less curiosity, to a certain extent, less moral controversy.