"Beasts" are not terrible, "cloaked beasts" are terrible

(Gentle and elegant)

Man is an animal, no different from an animal. The Book of Rites says, "The saints do it for the sake of etiquette to teach people, so that people can be courteous, and they know that they are different from beasts." This means that people understand etiquette and etiquette, and only then can they be different from animals.

Beasts are rude people, those who are despicable and obscene are beasts, and the evil words and deeds of animals are not hidden, undisguised, and are clear at a glance, so ordinary people are easy to identify.

The clothed animals and animals are different, the clothes are chuchu, the morality is calm, the mouth is full of benevolence and morality, giving people an image of a righteous gentleman, so it is extremely difficult for ordinary people to identify.

Beasts are rude, and cloaked beasts have "etiquette", which is the difference between the two. If it is said that the beast is less virtuous, then it can be said that the clothed beast has no virtue. "Courtesy without virtue" is the most accurate definition of a cloaked animal.

Animals are easy to recognize, such as rats crossing the street, and are often punished, while the dressed beasts are difficult to distinguish, like a decent gentleman, and are often embraced. Cloaked beasts are like "hamsters", and beasts are just "rats in the toilet", so the cloaked beasts often laugh at the beasts and mock their ignorance; they also despise the beasts and despise their pathos.

If the beast is a rogue, then the cloaked beast is a great rogue. At best, the beasts will only harm one party and harm for a while, while the clothed beasts may harm the world and harm the ages, so the beasts are not terrible, and the beasts and beasts are the most terrible.