On October 1, Shanghai's Minhang District announced the recruitment policy for young reserve talents and targeted transfer students, two of which caused controversy, one is that all the selected students are selected from 30 domestic universities, and the central and western universities are not welcome; the other is that overseas one-year master's degrees are not allowed to apply for reserve talents. Today, Teacher Miao broke open and crushed it, and told everyone about these two controversies.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="183" > top universities in the Midwest</h1>
In the talent requirements of Minhang District, it is clear that graduates of 30 universities in China can apply for youth reserve talents (45 people) and targeted selection and transfer (15 people), but returnees can only apply for young reserve talents, and cannot apply for directional selection. It can be seen that there is still a difference in the status of the two.
The list of these 30 universities can be said to be quite controversial. Among the original 985 engineering universities, 15 universities were not selected, including the Central University for Nationalities in Beijing, the Harbin Institute of Technology in Heilongjiang, the Jilin University in Jilin, the Dalian University of Technology and Northeastern University in Liaoning, the Hunan University in Hunan, the South China University of Technology in Guangdong, the Northwestern Polytechnical University and the Northwest A&F University in Shaanxi, the Sichuan University and the University of Electronic Science and Technology of Sichuan, the Chongqing University in Chongqing, the Lanzhou University in Gansu, and the National Defense Science and Technology University in Hubei.
If Northeastern University, Hunan University, and Northwest A&F University were "ignored" because they fell into the B category of world-class universities in the first round of double-first-class selection, the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China and South China University of Technology were "abandoned" because of their "administrative level", the National University of Defense Technology was "failed" because it was a military academy, and the Central University for Nationalities was "excluded" because it was a national college, then what about the other 985s?
The top universities in the three eastern provinces and the great southwest have been "completely wiped out", and only one Xi'an Jiaotong University has been left in the great northwest, so how much does Shanghai not want to see the talents of colleges and universities in the western and northeastern regions?
Correspondingly, four universities in Shanghai, East China University of Science and Technology, Donghua University, Shanghai Overseas Chinese University, and Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, have been selected, and even Shanghai University, a 211 university under the Shanghai Municipal Government, has also been successfully selected, which should be regarded as a kind of "local regional protection", right?
Shanghai has a special status and a particularly high-end demand for talents, which we can all understand, but I still feel sorry for the graduates of Harbin Institute of Technology, Jilin University, Sichuan University and other very excellent high-level colleges and universities.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="184" > two, overseas one-year master's degree</h1>
Minhang District requires that the graduate schools of returnees need to be in the top 200 of the latest list of QS, U.S.NEWS, ARWU, and THE World University Rankings, and the undergraduate must be double-first-class in China, and the master's degree system must be two years or more. Ranking, undergraduate, academic system, the three major thresholds are clear enough, right?
What is the level of the top 200 on these four charts? I posted the latest list at the end of the article, you may wish to refer to it, if you want to use a sentence to explain, that is, "the world's famous universities, the comprehensive ranking is equivalent to the domestic Wuhan University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University."
As for the master's degree system, it is required to be two years or more, which is clearly a one-year master's degree. I personally have no prejudice against a one-year master's degree, and I know that there are very few graduate programs that are quite difficult to apply for. But realistically speaking, behind the flooding of the term "shui shuo", more and more "water people" have diluted the gold content of foreign master's degrees for one year.
The positions in the system are becoming more and more unfriendly to "returnees", and the attitude of enterprises to overseas one-year masters is becoming increasingly cold. Shanghai, Tianjin, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and other provinces and municipalities directly under the Central Government no longer recruit students for international students; Guangdong's selection and transfer of students limits the scope of 60 overseas colleges and universities; Guangxi's selection and transfer students must have double first-class undergraduate degrees; Sichuan, Ningxia and other regions have also adjusted their own policies for selecting and transferring students.
In the recruitment of some public institutions and large enterprises, the "one-year master's degree" has been set as "sensitive vocabulary". WHEN HR encounters similar resumes, it either excludes them from the selection scope in order to "not make mistakes", or increases the scrutiny, lest the person who is recruited is "Shui Shuo".
Although some people have not been abroad for a long time, they always post photos of their travels abroad in the circle of friends, constantly proving that they are a "returnee", what does this phenomenon mean? Thinking back to the time when study abroad institutions were hot to promote the one-year master's degree "brushing education", I just want to use four words to express the mood at this moment, that is, "trance like a world away".
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="234" > three, once brilliant</h1>
Compared with the "slightly lonely" in recent years, the once one-year master's degree is a "fragrant feast" returning from overseas. We provide them with a large number of opportunities, such as priority admission for job hunting, such as providing a large number of civil service positions, such as priority recruitment in public institutions, such as job titles and when settling down, you can enjoy extra points. Under such "temptation", "taking shortcuts and brushing academic qualifications" has become the first choice for many students with good family backgrounds but slightly ordinary learning ability.
Spend hundreds of thousands of dollars, spend ten months, get a one-year master's degree, and enjoy the above various discounts after returning home, this cost performance, can you not make you excited?
Frankly speaking, in the one-year master's degree, there are both academic leaders who have outstanding academic performance and want to receive high-quality education abroad; there are also bachelors who are not prominent, and they cannot be admitted to famous universities in China and run to gold-plated students abroad; there are also scum who can only take a specialty in China purely for mixed academic qualifications. There are many colleges and universities in Southeast Asia and Eastern Europe dedicated to Chinese "gilding", and there are many similar colleges in Commonwealth countries.
In some schools, it is Chinese everywhere, and in some schools, there are professional substitute examiners, and even attending classes on your behalf can be a paid service. Such chaos is one of the reasons why employers are cautious in hiring one-year overseas masters.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="246" >4</h1>
Minhang District's attitude towards the top universities in the northeast and west can be seen as a trend in Shanghai's employment, because not only Minhang District, but also the selection policies of other districts in Shanghai are equally unfriendly to top college graduates in these two regions, and I have reason to think that similar employment standards are likely to spread to Jiangsu and Zhejiang regions.
Shanghai's attitude towards one-year masters can be seen as a change in the direction of "talent aesthetics" nationwide. Returnees are no longer equivalent to elites in the eyes of ordinary people, and one-year overseas masters are similar to "gilded slag" in the eyes of ordinary people.
It is foreseeable that if you want to go abroad for further study and then return to China to develop well, many people will no longer choose a one-year master's degree. It is also foreseeable that there may be many "gilded" schools that will change the school system to two years, or even more than two years.
It is worth discussing that many positions in China still maintain a "double standard" for overseas graduates and domestic graduates when applying for the examination. Overseas graduates with similar disciplines and majors can apply for the examination; domestic graduates with the same conditions are stuck and cannot move. It is also worth discussing that in the context of the state advocating vocational education and advocating the recruitment of talents not only by academic qualifications, should economically developed areas and high-end employers take the lead? How should I take the lead?
For more educational views, please pay attention to @Miao Teacher's Wonderful Pen Shenghua
Original is not easy, look forward to your likes and retweets.
#上海头条 #