In the 2020 civil service exam, there was such a question as "Playing three dozen white bone selection clips of "Journey to the West", asking: Assuming you are Sun Wukong, please simulate the scene to persuade Tang Sanzang to leave you." This question seems to ask you how to explain yourself to Tang Monk, but if you think so, then you have made the same mistake as Sun Wukong in the original work.
Just like the bridge section we often see when we read Xiu Xian's novels: "Where does the boy run?" Today I'm going to do it for Skywalker" "Let go!" My master is Jin Dan Jian Xiu! Do you dare to move me? "Often we all think that this is just the author's intention to set off the positive image of the protagonist, or the plot to kill." But when you sink your mind and substitute them into the real scene, you will find that these seemingly ridiculous bridges are actually very reasonable.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="3" > virtual world actually has a microcosm of reality</h1>
Whether it is a game or a novel, it is often mixed with human feelings. In "Water Margin", Wu Song stabbed Meng Zhou, was imprisoned in the mengzhou prison camp of the small pipe camp golden eye Biao Shi En, Shi En had already said hello, wanted Wu Song to be spared this big stick, but Wu Song used a bit of "inhumane" operation in the eyes of many people at the moment, who knew that the guan camp wanted to be humane with Wu Song, said: The new prisoner Wu Song, what disease did you get on the road? When it comes to this, everyone understands what it means, and Wu Song naturally knows it, but he still has to be hard to the end: I have never been harmed with the road, I can eat wine, I can eat meat, I can eat rice, and I can walk the road. This is simply a bargaining.
It is not difficult for us to see the shadow of human sophistication in reality, the care of acquaintances, idol worship, etc., which undoubtedly proves that the creation of virtual novels also refers to real life, or "grounded".
There is also a similar bridge section in the game, there is a door sect system in the "Ghost Valley Eight Wilds", the player can be promoted from the disciple all the way to the sect master, when the player serves as the elder of the sect gate, you can assign tasks to the disciples of the sect, let the disciples of the sect to help the sect find resources, and can get the red skill book that the disciples can't get. This is also very much in line with the real-world company system, where leaders direct employees and have access to the resources provided by the company.
As a hit worker, we must not want to be a creep all our lives, there will still be a desire for promotion, and then we have to work hard to complete the company's tasks, just like the game to do task leveling, wait until the experience is full to upgrade, turn into a leader.
The same is true of the hate system, after you kill an NPC, the NPCs who are well related to these NPCs will have a decrease in their liking for you, like after you hit someone else, his friends hate you?
In Sword Net III, as your reputation in the faction increases, the prestige of the opposing faction will also become lower and lower. It's as if you're capable of working at a company, and your rival company will take you as a thorn in the eye and a thorn in the flesh.
In addition to the originally set mechanisms in these games, there are also some players' default "rules", such as "FF14" after playing the copy to say a hard word, "Tree of Salvation" if you want to help brush a patch horn in the middle of the ** otherwise there is a high probability of being blocked.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="11" > look at the essence through the phenomenon, which may not be a bad thing</h1>
Seeing these, some people will feel, "I'm really tired of going to work, and I have to think about these things when I go to the game." Admittedly, when we play the game, we just need to immerse ourselves in it and have fun, and these things are just a small Easter egg for most players.
But what I want to say is that if you can improve your emotional intelligence or logical thinking by thinking about these things, it is not a good thing, isn't it? Like the question I said at the beginning, if the explanation is wrong, how can it be correct?
The correct way to answer is to admit your mistake first, "Master, I was wrong!" This is all the result of the disciple's recklessness for a while, and he did not listen to the master's words and acted without authorization. Now I regret this result very much, if only I could listen to the master's words at that time, "First try to calm down Tang Monk."
Then bring Tang Monk to the scene, through the way of laying out the facts and telling evidence, let Tang Monk understand the truth, but at this time, it must not be directly said that Tang Monk misunderstood him, After all, Tang Monk wants face as a master, but should give Tang Monk a step down. "In fact, when such a thing happened, the disciple was at fault first, and it was reasonable for the master to teach the disciple, although the disciple was reckless, but after all, he had eighteen martial arts, which could protect the master from learning the scriptures safely." After all, the road to learning the scriptures is arduous, force is not what the master is best at, and in the future, he will encounter many such unexpected disguises, if the disciples are not around, it is not good to not recognize the great cause of the master for a while. ”
This kind of answer is only a kind of correct answer, as long as it is not wrong according to this logic, many people will feel confused when they see this, obviously a thing that explains right and wrong, how can it involve so much content? What if we talk about the roles of Tang Monk and Sun Wukong and bring in a pair of quarrelsome boyfriends and girlfriends?
When your girlfriend is angry, you go and explain to her that you are right but that she is wrong, will it make her calm down and apologize? More often than not, it's getting noisier and worse, right?
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="18" > the end</h1>
Through thinking about these contents, it is not difficult to see that the virtual world is also flesh and blood, and some of the "troublesome" operations in the game may be the design that the author wants you to immerse yourself in. You are willing to carefully consider what the author wants to express between the lines, I think it is still very interesting, isn't it?