#"Flash hour" theme essay issue 2 #
Emperor Xiao Yan of Liangwu firmly believed in Buddhism and cherished compassion, and was the so-called tiger and wolf who talked about cause and effect with His Majesty.
He was so good to his brothers and nephews that he had no bottom line, asking for money to give money and asking people to give people. But his brothers and nephews did not want him to die early so that he could free up the throne.
He has a son named Xiao Lun, who is a rogue teenager who does no evil. Once in Xuzhou, he forced people to eat yellow food and tortured people to death. He once made people dress up as emperor fathers and pulled down and whipped. He also dressed up as a filial son to send a funeral for his father.
Such a contrarian son, however, was reluctant to discipline him, and he continued to promote his official position. Later, Xiao Lun openly killed the imperial court officials, and under the fierce emotions of the crowd, he also shielded them. Xiao Lun was lawless, sending bandits to rob the people, sending strong men to assassinate his father and brother, and poisoning him in wine in an attempt to kill his father, all of which threatened his safety, and he also tolerated him, believing that his son was still young and had always given him the opportunity to change.
Later, Hou Jing rebelled and surrounded Xiao Yan and the crown prince Xiao Gang in Taizhou City. Xiao Lun gathered 300,000 Qin Wang's army and stationed them outside the city. While establishing the image of loyalty and filial piety to the outside world, he stood still and watched his father being surrounded by thousands of tired soldiers and starving to death.
Poor Xiao Yanxiong was a man of great talent, a heart of benevolence, and finally died at the hands of the contrarian son.
Confusion: Benevolence does not necessarily mean unity, and fatherly kindness does not necessarily mean filial piety. Strict management and love must be combined to cultivate outstanding talents. Compared with today's education, schools have lost the right to punish students, and the law has lost its soft punishment of minors.