laitimes

The situation has changed? Russia "showed its sword" to the United States, Pakistan warned the White House, and the United States and France also quarreled

author:Global Bureau of Investigation

Many acts of injustice will kill themselves, come out of the mix, sooner or later will have to pay back!

In this world, no one can continue to maintain hegemony, the original "empire that never sets" is so, and the current United States is no exception.

In the past few decades, when the United States relied on hegemony to make mistakes and create chaos in the world, it should have thought that hegemony would eventually be broken one day, and the countries of the world that had been "bitter for a long time" would eventually rise up to fight back and "shine the sword" toward American hegemony.

On September 16, Russia, Pakistan and France simultaneously attacked the White House.

The situation has changed? Russia "showed its sword" to the United States, Pakistan warned the White House, and the United States and France also quarreled

Let's talk about Russia first, the Russian side "hammered" the United States to interfere in Russia's internal affairs, but the White House was "silent".

On the 16th, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov publicly stated that he had provided evidence to the United States about "US interference in the Russian Duma election" and was currently waiting for a response and explanation from Washington.

Also on the 16th, Russian journalist Gazdiev exposed a video showing a woman who spoke fluent Russian and was "instructing" Russian citizens on how to carry out "illegal operations" at polling stations to disrupt the election process.

Obviously, whether it is Lavrov's direct call to the United States or Gazdiev's "real hammer evidence", it shows that the United States is interfering in Russia's internal affairs, and it is still sparing no effort and ulterior motives to intervene.

In fact, long before Lavrov submitted the "real hammer evidence" to the United States, the Russian Security Service and the Kremlin repeatedly said that they had "irrefutable" evidence that the United States had many illegal acts of interfering in Russia's internal affairs.

To this end, the Russian Foreign Ministry also specially summoned the US ambassador to Russia Sullivan and publicly warned the White House that no external forces will be allowed to interfere in Russia's internal affairs.

The situation has changed? Russia "showed its sword" to the United States, Pakistan warned the White House, and the United States and France also quarreled

Judging from all the indications, the United States' interference in Russia's internal affairs has not only been "hammered" but also arrested.

As of now, the United States has still not responded to Russia's "bright sword", and the meaning of "weak heart" is particularly prominent.

What do you think about that?

1, the US conspiracy and trickery have once again been exposed, and the true face hidden under the false "veil of justice" has once again been exposed.

When Trump took office, Democrats intended to use the "Russiagate" incident to put pressure on Trump and Russia. However, after more than 2 years of investigation, it has been proved that the so-called "Russia" is completely fictitious, but a tool used by Democrats to achieve political goals.

Now, it is Biden's turn to take office, but still has not "spared" Russia, and a few days ago, he also announced the extension of the US national emergency for one year on the grounds that "the threat of external forces interfering in the US election has not been lifted" as a reason.

But now, the tricks of the United States have not succeeded, and its own move to interfere in russia's internal affairs has been caught, and the situation is already obvious who is making something out of nothing and who is shouting to catch a thief.

The situation has changed? Russia "showed its sword" to the United States, Pakistan warned the White House, and the United States and France also quarreled

2, the United States is so blatantly interfering in Russia's internal affairs, Putin will certainly not give up.

Especially in the case of conclusive evidence, the Russian side is completely reasonable, and Putin will not have any scruples when he makes a move. In the face of angry Russia, the White House only "remained silent" and pretended that nothing had happened, and it is estimated that it is difficult to pass the test.

Next, let's see how Putin will make moves.

3, Russia's "real hammer" of the United States' interference in internal affairs has also given the international community a wake-up call - in the face of the ulterior motives of the United States and the pervasive CIA, it is necessary to raise vigilance and vigilance to prevent the United States from provoking chaos through "infiltration, incitement" and other means, and then "subverting" other countries' regimes.

Don't forget that in addition to such a bad opponent as Russia, the United States, a European and American ally such as Britain, France and Germany, the United States also did the same. The world cannot help but guard against this.

Next, let's talk about Pakistan. At the critical moment, the Pakistani side directly issued a warning to the White House.

The situation has changed? Russia "showed its sword" to the United States, Pakistan warned the White House, and the United States and France also quarreled

Imran Khan

A few days ago, when US Secretary of State Blinken was "tortured" by Congress on the "withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan," he suddenly "smeared" Pakistan for no reason, saying that the Pakistani side "bets from both ends" when facing the situation in Afghanistan, and was also suspected of "harboring radical organizations," and the United States needs to reassess its relations with the Pakistani side.

For Blinken's groundless smear, on the 16th, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan directly replied, saying that he had never heard such a brazen and ignorant word.

Imran Khan pointed out that in the past few years, Pakistan has been attacked by nearly 50 armed groups because of Pakistan's support for the United States to carry out "anti-terrorism activities", and even the United States has carried out as many as 480 drone strikes in Pakistan.

I have to say that the Pakistani side helped the United States, not only did it not fall behind a good one, but it also had to be smeared by Blinken for no reason and beaten a rake backwards.

Moreover, if we have to break it up, the United States, which has launched 480 air strikes for no reason, has obviously done more than the "radical organization"!

The situation has changed? Russia "showed its sword" to the United States, Pakistan warned the White House, and the United States and France also quarreled

As for the so-called "harboring radical organizations", Imran Khan directly retorted that the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan is the most closely monitored area of the US military in Afghanistan, and if there is a so-called "safe haven", will the United States not know?

The implication is that the radical organization is hiding under the eyes of the US military, and you actually can't find it, but you still want to slander the Pakistani side as "harboring", which is the White House deliberately "throwing pots and throwing dirty water"? Or is the US military making excuses and excuses for its incompetence?

Finally, Imran Khan also warned the United States not to try to intervene in Afghanistan again, to create chaos and conflict, and that what the United States has done over the past 20 years has confirmed that the so-called "American redemption" is nothing more than an excuse for the United States to achieve its interests first.

In short, the misdeeds of the United States in the past 20 years have not only led to the chaos of the situation in Afghanistan, but also caused turmoil in the surrounding situation, if the United States really wants to see the situation in Afghanistan moving towards stability, it should put away its restless tentacles and honestly manage the domestic epidemic, economic and other crises.

The situation has changed? Russia "showed its sword" to the United States, Pakistan warned the White House, and the United States and France also quarreled

However, just as Russia and Pakistan are showing their swords to the United States, France, which has been dissatisfied with the long-standing hegemony of the United States, has also quarreled with the White House.

On the 16th, Biden announced that the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia have established a tripartite military alliance called "Oakus" in order to share military technology, carry out military trade exchanges, and so on.

On the same day, Biden promised to help Australia acquire nuclear submarines and American Tomahawk cruise missiles.

In this regard, Australian Prime Minister Morrison is very excited, saying that Australia's military defense will be greatly improved, and it will also gain long-range strike capabilities.

However, although Morrison is very happy, the Australian people can't sit still, the United States is obviously "handing the knife" to Australia - to say that it is good, it is to enhance Australia's military strength and make it match the United States; to say that it is ugly, it is to use Australia as a gun, but before using it, it is necessary to "strengthen" this gun. After all, Australia's current military strength is indeed not enough to see.

In addition, some rejoice and some are sad. Morrison's side is happy, the French side is not.

The situation has changed? Russia "showed its sword" to the United States, Pakistan warned the White House, and the United States and France also quarreled

It turned out that France had signed an arms purchase contract with Australia to help The Australian side build 12 large attack submarines, with a total value of up to $66 billion.

But now, if the United States wants to help Australia obtain nuclear submarines, this order is obviously unnecessary, even "redundant".

Therefore, after Biden's speech on the 16th, Australian politicians immediately released the news of "canceling the order with France", after all, with nuclear submarines, who will spend a lot of money to buy ordinary submarines?

Seeing that the "cooked duck" was about to fly away, French Foreign Minister Le Drey directly "shelled" the United States, saying that this kind of behavior was "inserting a knife in the back", and the trust relationship between France and the United States and Australia had been destroyed, demanding an explanation from the United States and Australia.

Under the strong opposition and dissatisfaction of France, politicians from France, the United States and Australia began to quarrel, some people believe that buyers and sellers have the right to choose, some people think that they should abide by the spirit of the contract, and some people denounce the United States for "two sides and three knives, horizontal knives to seize love", and do whatever it takes to give priority to their own interests.

The situation has changed? Russia "showed its sword" to the United States, Pakistan warned the White House, and the United States and France also quarreled

In short, the large order of 66 billion US dollars is not a trivial matter, and the "war of words" between the United States, France and Australia is estimated to be inevitable.

Of course, the White House acted so unkindly, and the beam between the United States and France was also concluded.

Next, let's see how Macron will make moves.

Read on