On this topic —
I'm sure no one has more say than the "paper clips.".
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="131" > which is a popular science problem that attracts global attention</h1>
"Can Fukushima Happy Water make the nightmare of the horror movie 'Fly man' come true?"
In principle, this is a popular science problem involving many scientific fields such as oceanography , gastronomy , biology , nuclear physics , genetic engineering , and medicine.
As everyone knows, since last year, the Japanese authorities, which have always regarded themselves as "high-quality," have rightly and boldly declared that they will discharge Fukushima Happy Water into the ocean out of consideration of the "cost of funds."
The move has sparked strong condemnation around the world.
It should be noted that once millions of tons of Fukushima Happy Water are released and pour into the Pacific Ocean, countless marine organisms, and the radioactive materials in the body must be seriously exceeded - at that time, the safety of all seafood products on the Pacific coast will be debatable.
The dangers of genetic mutation in nuclear food are well known, but what is the specific lethality of seafood foods cultivated by Fukushima Happy Water?
In this regard, I am afraid that the people of the whole earth have a big question mark in their hearts, right?
At this time, it is naturally the turn of the paper clip and other dry science popularization v to shine and heat up, after all, they, can not rely on science to eat?
At least nominally.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="134" > paper clips have long been involved in the field of nuclear food</h1>
Many popular science students have experience in the field of "Fukushima Happy Water", for example, not long ago, they invariably made a series of "popular science" videos with different titles but the same theme.
However, its unified intention made netizens almost laugh off their teeth.
They not only stitched together "Japan does not pour Fukushima happy water" and "Chinese do not eat seafood" in a rigid logic.
He also explained in a whispering manner: Let Chinese eat like this, and the biodiversity of the ocean will be destroyed...
The corresponding events are already well known, and the paper clips have been warmly received by netizens, and various "comments and praises are a dragon".
Of course these are all digressions.
Let ordinary people have a richer, more objective and more accurate understanding of the dangers of nuclear food, which is the correct direction of science popularization based on Fukushima Happy Water.
If the paper clips are "not professional enough in this regard", so it leads to such a "fallacy", then it is better to focus on their own field after the suggestion.
For example, is not a "former" team member of the paper clip currently working at the Fort Detrick base in the United States, known as "contemporary 731" and "focused on biological warfare for 70 years"?
If you can't do the "nuclear food hazard" field, won't you change the track and go to the "human genetic mutation" field that you are most proficient in?
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="168" > Will Fukushima Happy Water make the nightmare of "fly-changing people" come true? </h1>
When it comes to human genetic mutations, Shenxiu can't help but think of a sci-fi horror movie called "Fly Man" in the 80s.
Released in 1986, "Fly Man" tells the bizarre story of "human beings who fused the genes of flies and mutated into terrifying humanoid flies".
The film left a psychological shadow for many post-8090s childhoods, made a lot of contributions, and because the visual effects were too heavy, it also became the winner of the 59th Academy Award for Best Makeup.
The film's setting, based on a "matter portal" that can first decompose and then recombine and restore matter, including living organisms, shows a humanoid fly-like horror scene.
The whole film takes "the genetic fusion of humans and flies" as the core of the plot.
Obviously, the genetic variation of the "Fly Man" style and the genetic mutation caused by radiation in reality are significantly different.
But the point is that the creepy horror that the two can give people is no different.
Here, I dare ask the paper clips:
From a scientific and objective point of view, if a person eats Japanese seafood fed with Fukushima happy water-
Is there a possibility of genetic variation? What is the probability of mutation? How carcinogenic is it? How long will the hazard last? Will it be passed on to future generations? Can it be circumvented and prevented?
And, is it possible that the "fly man" in the movie will make the nightmare come true in reality?
I believe that with the resource channels and professionalism of the paper clips, it will not be so difficult to know the answers to these questions.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="197" > conclusion</h1>
Finally, for humanitarian reasons, I would like to give a friendly tip to netizens in Japan and the United States:
"Japan doesn't pour Fukushima Happy Water, and you shouldn't eat seafood either."
According to the distribution of the world's surface currents, if the Fukushima Happy Water really returns to the sea, then the first to bear the brunt of it should be you two brothers and sisters.
Of course, what if you think "Fukushima Happy Seafood" is delicious?
In that case —"
Delicious, you eat more.