Recently, many netizens have begun to discuss Zhang Tielin, who was once a predecessor outside the circle, and now has changed his identity and become a cultural master.
Talking about Zhang Tielin is not without reason, because some of his personal views are too interesting and have aroused everyone's discussion. Recently, Zhang Tielin described Chinese culture as not yet fully open, and it is necessary to learn foreign art culture.
He said that China is a country with a long culture, but in fact, it still has a very realistic phenomenon in the system. That is, among all the art museums in China, we are all showing our own things. And what about museums in western developed countries? What it presents to everyone is a collection of cultures from all over the world.
There are no foreigners in the big museum, and it is such a country with a long history, which is not our lack! So this one thing is a specimen thing, so that our things can't go out, and we limit ourselves to this nest.
Our system, our professional vision, our culture are not open.
We do not take other people's things as things, we do not take our own culture as part of the world culture, we do not take our own culture to integrate into the international culture to see our own culture, there is no comparison, how can we reflect the longevity of Chinese culture.
In zhang tielin's words to describe, our things are too limited, not yet fully opened, should not be put in captivity, need to take out the country for everyone to appreciate is right.
Hearing this, many cultural people may have different views on Zhang Tielin's statement, and even too many people want to comment. Zhang Tielin is talking about culture, and he is comparing contemporary Chinese art culture with contemporary international culture, and comparing domestic and foreign museums.
He found this problem, saying that Chinese culture has not gone abroad. But he seems to have forgotten one thing, and that is that the foreign colonial period was passed by looting things, and that their own international culture was formed. Zhang Tielin seemed to have forgotten this and did not realize it.
The so-called international pluralistic art culture is built on the basis of burning, killing and looting, do they dare to admit this? History has a truth, please do not erase the truth, do you dare to move these truths to the table to talk about?
What is culture? There is nothing wrong with the need for inclusion in art and culture. But if you only see the so-called degree of cultural display, but do not understand the connotation of the real Chinese art culture, I believe that Zhang Tielin himself has not yet understood what the foundation of Chinese culture is!
The thinking of our young people is the same, and it is absolutely not allowed to stay on the wrong view of high-end goods and imported goods. Times have changed, and the moon abroad is no longer round. Zhang Tielin described foreign cultures as diverse, really?