How to see the story of the abandoned baby Olympics

The article is from the WeChat public account: memory bearer. Welcome to read the full article.

In the women's 100m butterfly competition at the Tokyo Olympics, Canada's McNeil won the first gold medal at the Eastern Olympics by winning the first gold medal at the Eastern Olympics for Canada by a narrow margin of 0.05 seconds.

But her life and the story that followed have caused a lot of discussion.

This girl, named McNeil, is a post-00, born on February 26, 2000 in Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province, and was abandoned by her parents when she was 1 year old.

A Canadian couple adopted the child and adopted another Chinese girl, also an abandoned baby, as her sister.

A very simple thing, there are the following topics that are hotly discussed on the Internet.

1. McNeil was born in China, and is of Chinese descent by blood. Is it appropriate that she won the gold medal from Chinese athletes on behalf of Canada?

2, a good pair of parents without vision, because of their lack of humanity, so that we lost an Olympic champion.

Around these two topics, a series of debates have been launched on the Internet about various emotional trumpets, against China, against Canada, against son preference, and on the definition of loyalty.

It's interesting, let's look at these topics one by one.

McNeil showed amazing swimming talent from an early age, because their country did not have more public funds to invest in professional competitions, so it was up to her adoptive parents to invest a lot of money and time to train her, and eventually embarked on the road to the championship.

This model is obvious in Canada, athletes are basically unorganized to rely on, either by family or by commercial institutions, but commercial institutions are willing to fund, unless you have achieved a certain amount of achievements and can endorse them.

So from that point of view, McNeill won the gold medal not for Canada, but for herself, but also for her adoptive parents.

I have a basis and a legal basis for saying this.

Do you think about it, does the patent for your invention in the company belong to you, or does it belong to the company? The proportion of specific operations can be discussed, but in most cases, most of the heads belong to the company.

Just like maybe the main code of the WeChat software is written by you, but it does not mean that the commercial ownership of this product is in your hands, because the company is your capital, just like who does the company belong to? Belongs to the Board of Directors.

Many times our athletes are fighting for money for the country, which is determined by the training model. You said that you are a small child, who was selected for the city team, the provincial team, the national team, the food used to cultivate your funds are organized, who is your capital? The organization is your investor.

We have a lot of athletes who become famous after they get into conflict with the organization because of the endorsement fee problem. It is normal to have contradictions, just as there are contradictions between Cao Yunjin and Deyun She.

From Cao Yunjin's point of view, I am famous, the money I earn, why give the Deyun Society a big head?

From the perspective of the Deyun Society, I don't know which person is famous, I raise hundreds of unknown money-losing cross-talk actors, you are famous and can't turn it in, brothers drink the northwest wind?

Just like the venture capital track, a track 50 companies I voted one by one, 49 have lost, I will point to your listed one back to turn the loss into a profit, you said you are at this time, you can clear who is the boss?

This is why Cao Yunjin was expelled from the door wall and Yue Yunpeng went farther and farther away, because the former broke the rules.

Back to the point, I made it clear who was in vs. who the whole thing was.

In front of us is McNeil vs Zhang Yufei, just like two entrepreneurial teams in a certain field of positive PK, behind their respective investors are adoptive parents, and our sports organization.

You notice, this is the way things are.

The mall is like a battlefield, each is its master, your adoptive parents raised you from the age of 1, and also raised you so excellent, you fight for your adoptive parents, the battle is very glorious, there is nothing wrong.

Some people on the Internet have to find pressure on this child, and put a hat on the head of the child, that is the possession of the drama essence, your desire to perform is too strong, but even the respective boss is not clear.

The second topic, the emergence of this topic, is inherently problematic.

Where is it embodied? The people who think about the problem in this way are legally illiterate.

Abandonment of a baby is illegal and shall be punished by fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or, depending on the seriousness of the circumstances, criminal detention and public surveillance.

So it's not a cost-effective question. Whether she is a future Olympic champion or not, she is even a troll in the future, a keyboard man, and when she is one year old, you have to raise it.

If you don't raise her, then someone will raise you, and you go to the trumpet and squat, where you will take care of the food.

So when McNeil's biological parents learned that she had won the Olympic Championship, they cried on the phone and said to each other: I'm sorry.

When some netizens were discussing whether to recognize the ancestors and return to the ancestors, I felt very strange, shouldn't the first reaction be to pursue responsibility?

The first reaction is not to defend the law, where do we read our books?

Unfortunately, most of this matter has passed the prosecution period. Where the statutory maximum sentence is less than 5 years' imprisonment, the statute of limitations is 5 years.

I think there seems to be a loophole in this matter. You say that a child, abandoned at the age of 1, can sue his biological parents at the latest at the age of 6.

The question is, 6 years old, how does she sue?

So the validity period of this matter should be 30 years, and 40 years is more reasonable.

Then what we hear is not crying and saying sorry, but you go to the trumpet first and eat five years of prison food.

That's how I think about this specific thing, and I think I'm making it pretty clear.

Of course, I also know that what you see elsewhere is not this, other places are mostly antagonistic emotions, and I have seen that most bloggers have to pull this matter China and Canada.

China has a population of 1.4 billion and Canada has a population of 29 million. The forest is big, the forest is big, there are birds.

There's a very famous Canadian, you know, I'm definitely not talking about Wu, I'm talking about Bethune, and we've read his story since we were kids.

A Canadian, thousands of miles away, came to help us, and died of an infection in order to rescue our wounded.

Also Canadian, in the famous Canadian mutilation case in 2012, Luka Rocco Maniota killed Lin Jun, a Chinese student in Wuhan, raped, mutilated, ate some of the corpses, and filmed the whole process and spread it online.

Who do you say is a Canadian?

Just like us, we have Li Yunlong, there are fat translators, if everyone is like Li Yunlong, can little Japan come in?

So if you have to analyze the country in an anthropomorphic way, you are either stupid or have ulterior motives.

Back to this specific case, this case is very special, equivalent to our fat translation just right on the other person's Bethune.

Is fat translation Chinese? Yes, the problem is, he is a scumbag, a sinner.

So we don't have to speak for him, because he can't represent our overall image.

And this pair of abandoned baby parents, that is, the contemporary fat translator, they have committed a crime, the reason why they have not been sent to the number to reform is because of luck, because they have encountered loopholes.

Speaking for sinners is really detrimental to our overall image.

Since it comes to crimes, it is worth analyzing that such crimes are unique and have recurred.

The only one, that's no rut, the forest is big, there are always a few villains, repeated, we have to think.

In fact, there is analysis on the Internet, and the analysis of the preference for sons over daughters, after all, the female babies in the abandoned babies are the main body. But unfortunately, the analysis has finally become regional black.

For example, such incidents occur in Jiangxi a lot, then it begins to black region, saying that there is a general preference for sons and daughters in a certain place.

This way of thinking about the problem is a kind of laziness, just like there are still stems on the Internet, saying that Guangdong people eat Fujian people, do they eat you, or have you eaten?

I have analyzed the preference for sons over daughters, and the example given is Shanghai. The phenomenon of son preference in Shanghai is quite light, and the status of women is also quite high, why do you think?

Why? They all grew up Chinese and learned the same things, and the reason why they later evolved differently on some issues was mostly caused by the economic structure.

Shanghai opened its port in 1843 and entered industrialization very early, and in the era when men and women were still weaving in other places, Shanghai women became textile workers.

Women go to work, people also earn money, people are not attached to their husbands, what if you are a man? What are you bullish on?

Why do Shanghai men develop the habit of cooking? Because the wife did not leave work, why did the wife not leave work? The wife is making money.

The region where China's second son concept is very weak is the northeast, why? Also because of the early entry into industrialization.

In the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, the industrial base in the northeast was the best, most of the people were state-run units, everyone went to work, they all earned wages, why was the status different? You have to have a son, do you have a son to be the head of the authorities or can you do it?

So there's a saying on the Internet that if McNeil wasn't abandoned, she might not have won the title. Because she is likely to become another Fan Shengmei. It is to go to the city early to work and buy a house for my brother.

Do you think this is blackening us? No, this is pointing us in the right direction.

You look at it as a matter of perception, and in the final analysis it is an economic problem, an economic structural problem. In the final analysis, the industrialization of some regions is not enough, and the informatization is not enough.

It is a pragmatic attitude to develop it if it is insufficient.

I once used the example of studying abroad, forty years ago so poor, many people are worried about allowing them to study abroad, they have become an export of talents to others, and they can't come back.

Deng Gong smiled: You can rest assured, do a good job of yourself, run away temporarily, and will eventually come back.

More than twenty years after the death of the elderly, a large-scale return of talent has occurred, is this a strategic prediction? No, this is grasping the essence of the root cause of all problems.

Tao Li does not say anything, the next is its own, you have benefits, are you still afraid that people will not come to the door?

In the final analysis, developing oneself and doing a good job is the hardest truth of all truths.

There is a breakthrough in breaking any problem, a profit to solve a thousand worries, let the local economy go up, let the local people get rich, let women earn as much as men, and we will look back after a few generations of wealth.

Looking back on what? Looking back and reliving Deng Gong's words. Three words: you rest assured.