laitimes

Internet celebrity live suicide, who is responsible

Recently, the internet celebrity blogger "Luo Kitten Cat" committed suicide by drinking pesticides during the live broadcast, and died after rescue was ineffective. Screenshots of online transmission show that when she took out pesticides in the live broadcast, some netizens had left a message in the live broadcast room to coax "drink it". The family of "Luo Kitten cat" said that the perpetrators of the rioters would be held legally responsible.

Another tragedy related to booing. If you pay a little attention to the news, you may find that similar tragedies are not the first time they have occurred. In 2018, Li Mouyi, a girl from Qingyang, Gansu Province, climbed up a tall building with the intention of taking her own life, and there were many onlookers coaxing downstairs: "Jump, jump fast." Some people even excitedly sent a circle of friends: "Finally someone really jumped off the building, jump if you want to jump, be decisive, don't find trouble for the police." "Eventually the girl fell to her death. In 2020, a woman in Dengzhou, Henan Province, wanted to throw herself into the river on a certain river bridge, and Yang Mouqi, a onlooker, instigated the woman to commit suicide by throwing herself into the river in order to attract people's attention, and filmed a video posted online. Fortunately, the woman was rescued in time after falling into the river.

In the suicide incident of the Internet celebrity blogger, the friend of "Luo Kitten cat" once said that the "Luo Kitten Cat" did not think about really committing suicide that day, the pesticide was diluted with the drink, and the drink was also because the people in the live broadcast room got up and drank it, and after the live broadcast, they also called the 120 emergency call. Thus, this tragedy could have been avoided. However, the coaxing of netizens or played an inducing and inciting role, in a sound of "drink it", the psychological pressure of the already depressed light students is getting bigger and bigger, and finally the rationality collapses and makes light actions.

The loss of a precious life is not only an irreparable tragedy for itself, but also leaves endless pain for the family behind it. In the face of the light life, people with a little normal reason and emotion will try their best to stop and save at the first time, why would someone coax others to commit suicide? These agitators are too indifferent and numb.

In the Dengzhou woman jumping into the river case, according to article 26 of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, Yang Mouqi, who caused a negative social impact, was sentenced to 9 days of administrative detention. In this incident, some lawyers believe that netizens who left messages in the live broadcast for the owner to drink were suspected of helping suicide. However, due to the large number of instigators, it is difficult to determine the legal responsibility, and it is difficult to determine the final result.

However, from the perspective of the live broadcast platform, the live broadcast suicide is obviously harmful information, and the platform side cannot just ban the account after the tragedy occurs. Instead, we should be vigilant, invest more technical forces in the development of tools and systems to identify such information, and timely judge and stop such live broadcasts. In addition, the reporting mechanism should also be combined with artificial intelligence review, smooth the channels for netizens to report and police linkage, and do our best to prevent suicide and other behaviors. A little earlier discovery may save a life.

The evil of human nature often inadvertently frightens us. From reality to the Internet, the boobers who revel in the tragedies of others still do not realize how shady their actions are, and what they consume is the lives of innocent people. These bloody "carnivals" should have been stopped long ago. (Soil velvet)

Source: Guangming Network - Commentary Channel