Is there a certain standard for literary works above life, and who will judge them?

The online discussion of the Nobel Prize in Chinese Literature is divided into two camps, with red and black longitude and latitude. One of the main points of contention is the fair and objective reflection of the facts of life? Or is it exaggerating and discrediting that era?

We know that literary works are the products of the times, the products of the author's own thoughts, cognitions, experiences, perceptions, emotions and rich inner worlds that violently collide with real life.

No matter what kind of storyline, character presets, structural arrangements, inner monologues, and ideological backgrounds are inseparable from the real life scenes that are touched every time. In order to make readers feel that the story is vivid and interesting, often the scenes and details of the story are refined and processed by the creator in accordance with the requirements of the preset theme, including certain exaggerations and fictions, rising to a certain artistic height, so that the work is more expressive, more infectious, more attractive to the reader, and the author's purpose is also achieved.

This is the so-called basic principle of literary works derived from life, higher than life.

Whether the essence of a literary work is exposed or praised is inconclusive, just as the article cannot be defined high or low, it is not as if science has complete data verification. But in the final analysis, literary works show the people in capital letters, the living conditions and details of people, and the stories of all kinds of sweets, sourses, bittersweets, ups and downs, and earth-shattering ghosts and gods that occur between the protagonist and others.

Thus releasing the author's thoughts, emotions, moods and indescribable self-congratulations in the depths of the author's soul!

That is to say, whether it is "Quiet Don River", "How Steel is Made", "One Hundred Years of Solitude", "Resurrection" and other world famous works are the writer's profound descriptions of events in the process of social history. This description is a mirror of the historical era, deconstructing to varying degrees the thoughts and actions of social groups or individuals in the context of the era, and the significance of this historical picture is to show the state of the protagonist of the work in his environment, and the extremely rich ideological intentions expanded by the characters also include the progressive significance of social development.

However, it must be admitted that most works express a light gray tone that deviates from the mainstream of the times, including the difficulties of the individual in the scene and the color of the artistic expression that the author wants.

Therefore, the author's creative intention is pre-set, and it is obvious what kind of waves his conception has experienced, or no matter what kind of thematic mood, the emotional intelligence temperament caused by the author's sensitive passion may be part of the tension of his work, and it is the most wonderful part.

The question is, is the objective world described by the author a part, a part, or a leaf of knowledge.

Since the works are all purifications of life scenes or a certain height of artistic expression, as most authors say, this person is not another person, but a composite of several characters. That is to say, the work needs the twists, complexity and high personality of the characters to present the author's true intentions and attract readers to resonate.

So, is there a standard for this refinement that is higher than life? How high is it higher than life? Is there an extremeization of personality and events? Can the extended meaning of the story be seen in the subtle or infinite reverie? Obviously no one answered this question very clearly. A work read by a hundred people has a hundred senses of reading, but most of them are only slight differences, which are determined by the homogeneity of the social life environment, no matter how detached you are, you cannot be separated from this era.

People of the same era have a natural affinity for the feelings of works describing the same era, although there may be differences in different social and professional experiences, but the handling of the events depicted in the general environment, the progress of the story, and the creation of the characters can be felt to varying degrees, and they can make their own judgments on their truth and exaggeration, and roughly know whether the author has its potential ineffable mood.

And people who have crossed the era, people who have not experienced any era are another matter. At this point, there can be a rough evaluation of some literary works in recent years, including the Nobel Prize.

At the very least, what do you feel in the work? What is the enlightening meaning or the overall intuitive image? What is the color of the picture in front of you?

It must be explained that this controversy over the red and black of literary works is carried out under the premise of the harvest of capital at present, and its significance is far-reaching.