I vaguely remember the 2006 match between a team of five masters, including Xu Tianhong, Liu Dahua, Zhang Qiang, and Bu Fengbo, and tissot, the top chess software at that time. At that time, chess software had developed by leaps and bounds, not only had super computing power, could calculate tens of thousands of moves per second, and had a strong opening as a support.
The first head-to-head encounter between the five chess masters and the chess software was also the only one
Liu Dahua and five other masters play against chess software wave Tissot
In the first round of matches, the five masters can also achieve 1 win, 3 and 1 loss, of which Zhang Qiang is easily victorious; Liu Dahua is finally defeated due to a careless move; Xu Tianhong can also gain the advantage of one more horse; but in the end, because of the problem of time, he had to agree to the chess. After a short break, the second round of the game began, led by Inspur Tissot, and soon after the start of the tournament, the first hand advantage of the intelligent chess software was highlighted, and the result was that Liu Dahua and Bu Fengbo were defeated; Zhang Qiang and Xu Tianhong stubbornly topped the peace; Master Wang fought backwaters, Lectra Computer, saved a game for human chess players, and the second round of results were 2 losses, 2 losses and 1 wins.
Xu Yinchuan vs. Tsurus Tissot
In the final result, Inspur Tissot defeated the five masters 11:9, and then Xu Yinchuan, who was at the peak of his life, was ordered to play two rounds of duels with Inspur Tissot, resulting in a tie between both and both.
After this competition, no more human chess players challenged the intelligent chess software, because the intelligent chess software developed too fast, and humans could not keep up. More than ten years later, a top chess software only needs to configure ordinary desktop computers, chess power has surpassed human special chess masters, and chess soft has become a sparring teacher for many professional chess players for chess dismantling research.
The development of smart chess software, is there a big advantage or a big disadvantage?
Big pros or cons?
Some people say that it is a big disadvantage
The reason they give is that the emergence of chess softness has seriously affected the fairness of the game, some chess players rely on cheating to easily win the championship, and get bonuses and reputations, such scandals are also frequently exposed, such as a young talented chess master, for various reasons, cheating in the way of installing cameras on the tip of the pen and loading receivers in the ear, and there are incidents in the past few years when a national champion shelled chess players for cheating. Chess needs to be studied and studied day by day, can not be achieved overnight, some people can easily win the championship through chess soft, so that those who have struggled for chess for most of their lives are so embarrassed! The long-term development of chess is also very unfavorable!
Some people say that the lee is big
They believe that the use of chess soft cheating is after all a minority, can not be generalized, and large games have preventive measures. Chess soft can improve the training efficiency of professional chess players, there is no chess soft professional chess players can only use chess boards, chess pieces to swing chess, dismantle chess, sometimes a situation may have to think for hours or even days, the emergence of chess soft has greatly improved the efficiency of chess dismantling. "The first person in chess" Wang Tianyi is using chess softness to continuously improve!
I think the emergence of chess software is a good thing more good than a disadvantage, not only professional chess players can improve through chess soft training, ordinary chess enthusiasts can also play chess through chess soft, review and thus achieve the purpose of improvement, which is equivalent to finding a teacher who can accompany many chess hobbies for 24 hours.
More importantly: the emergence of chess soft let us know that there is a gap between human chess players and chess soft, and there is still a lot of room for improvement!
The question is, how big is the gap between the top human chess players and the top chess software?
Artificial intelligence chess software
This question has been in my mind many times, but has not found the answer, a few days ago to find a game of Wang Tianyi, may be able to find a little clue.
This game of chess is under Wang Tianyi and chess software, whether it is a combination of man and machine is unknown, but from the idea of chess, it can definitely be chess software. Because it uses the cold layout "iron scooter" move, which is a layout that no top professional chess player can adopt against Wang Tianyi! After abandoning the horse at the beginning, the middle endgame was a variety of strange tricks and tricks, so that the "first person in chess" Wang Tianyiduozi could not make it strong, but was taken down by a quick counterattack by the opponent!
Chess game:
(The mini program has been added here, please go to today's headline client to view)
In addition to various objective factors such as Wang Tianyi's failure to seriously move chess, taking this game of chess as a reference, I think that the difference between Wang Tianyi and the chess software is between 2 first and 3 first! The opening horse is equivalent to 3 first, this game of chess is a soft first, you need to fold to the advantage of the first, in addition, there is a point, that is, when the red side abandons the horse after the fast advantage.
"The first person to play chess" Wang Tianyi
How big is the gap? It is difficult for the average enthusiast to know, and perhaps professional chess players do not know, because intelligent AI is still developing, still improving, and hope that human chess players can one day break through the limit and surpass themselves, after all, any artificial intelligence is artificial!