Welcome to Xiaoqi's channel, please use your little thumbs to like, comment, and forward, thank you! Xiaoqi also wishes everyone a prosperous Year of the Dragon and all the best! It's time to make money, it's time to make money, it's time to make money!
Text: Xiaoqi popular science
Editor|Xiaoqi popular science
42-year-old Ah Tao was found dead in a rental house on the 23rd of last month. This man in the prime of life, his life came to an abrupt end, which is really embarrassing. Ah Tao worked as a warehouse manager in a Dingdong store, and his previous life experience was also quite rich, he had done business in Shanxi, and came to Beijing Dingdong to buy vegetables two years ago, and worked as a delivery clerk, store manager and warehouse, and also changed many stores. It can be said that Ah Tao has been busy with life.
On the 17th, Ah Tao was denied leave on the grounds that his eyes could not see clearly. On the 18th, the store manager asked him to go to work, and Tao said that it was difficult and his eyes were bloodshot and he couldn't see. But even so, Tao's request for leave was not approved. Let's just say, this company is too unkind. People are uncomfortable like that, and they have to go to work. The body is the capital of the revolution, if the body collapses, how can it work?
In the end, Ah Tao lost contact after taking leave due to physical discomfort on the 19th. By the time it was discovered, it was already forever separated. An autopsy revealed sudden death, but the exact cause of death is unknown. Tao's family asked Dingdong to buy groceries, but the other party said that Tao was an employee of a third-party company. On October 11, the third-party platform contact person said that Ah Tao and Dingdong Grocery Shopping are labor cooperative relations, and their death is not a work-related injury, and tens of thousands of humanitarian compensation can be given. Ah Tao's father is a cleaner, and when he heard such a statement, he naturally couldn't accept it. Can these tens of thousands of yuan in humanitarian compensation be worth a human life?
On October 12, Dingdong set up a special team to deal with the matter with a third party. The staff said that the family's request for 4 million was not agreed, and the family said that they were asking for compensation according to work-related injuries and did not recognize humanitarian compensation. This matter is so deadlocked, and it is still being processed.
In recent years, there have been many incidents of sudden death of employees, many of which are related to work intensity. Everyone is working hard for life, but sometimes, their lives are lost, but they can't get the compensation they deserve. Just like Ah Tao, he worked in Dingdong to buy groceries and paid his own labor, but in the end, because he was a labor dispatch employee, it was difficult to even fight for work-related injury compensation. Isn't that chilling?
Labor dispatch is not uncommon in today's society. In order to avoid risks, many units choose to cooperate with third-party labor dispatch companies, so that once something happens, they can push the responsibility away. This is like the "big law of throwing the pot", you are relaxed, but you are miserable for those labor dispatch employees. They do the same work as regular employees, or even more tired and hard, but they do not enjoy the same treatment and security.
As the saying goes, "If you can hide from the first day of junior high school, you can't hide from the fifteenth". Employers think that they can evade responsibility through labor dispatch, but in reality, this practice will only lead to more conflicts and problems. When an employee has an accident, the family naturally wants to seek justice for their loved ones. And the prevarication and indifference of the unit will only make the contradiction more intense.
Dingdong put the responsibility on the third-party company, but the tens of thousands of yuan in humanitarian compensation given by the third-party company could not satisfy the family at all. It is reasonable for the family to demand compensation according to the worker's compensation. After all, Ah Tao was unwell during work and finally died suddenly. If it weren't for the intensity of work and pressure, maybe Ah Tao would not have passed away at such a young age.
The incident has also sparked a discussion about issues related to labor dispatch. Is labor dispatch reasonable? Should the employer be responsible for the dispatched employees? These questions are worth pondering.
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with labor dispatch itself, but the key is to standardize management. Employers should not use labor dispatch as a tool to evade responsibility, but should effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of labor dispatch employees. First of all, when choosing a labor dispatch company, the unit should strictly check to ensure that the labor dispatch company is qualified and powerful, and can provide good protection for employees. Second, employers should treat dispatched employees equally, and cannot treat them differently. They should enjoy the same treatment and benefits as regular employees who have contributed to the development of the company. Finally, government departments should also strengthen the supervision of labor dispatch and formulate more perfect laws and regulations, so that labor dispatch has laws to follow and rules to follow.
Only in this way can we avoid the recurrence of tragedies like Ah Tao's. We should not let labor dispatch become a "safe haven" for units to evade responsibility, but should make it a reasonable, legal and fair form of employment. After all, every worker should be respected and protected, and their lives and rights should not be disregarded. I hope that the incident of Ah Tao can be properly resolved as soon as possible, and I also hope that similar tragedies will not happen again.