What are you waiting for? The chance for good luck is fleeting! Hurry up and follow me and start a lucky journey together! I wish you good fortune and all your wishes come true!
"Laymen read history": Chen Cheng said that you are doing the Communist Party a favor
The Mystery of the Kuomintang's Defeat: From "Left-behind Place" to "Private Mansion"
Opening story: In Shenyang in 1948, the smoke of gunpowder was filled, and the Kuomintang and Communist armies were engaged in a desperate struggle. Xiao Wang, a young Kuomintang soldier, was supposed to fight bloody battles on the front line, but he stayed leisurely in a luxurious mansion in the city of Shenyang. This is not a barracks, but a "stay-at-home place" for his company commander, which is actually a "mansion" privately owned by the company commander. Xiao Wang's daily work is not drills, but running errands for the company commander and taking care of business. He witnessed first-hand how the commanders used the "stay-behind places" to enrich themselves, hoard supplies, and live a life of drunkenness, while their brothers on the front line were in rags and starved. Xiao Wang couldn't help but wonder: How can such an army win a battle?
1. The Road to Defeat: From "Left-behind" to "Corruption"
There were many reasons for the defeat of the Kuomintang army in the later stages of the civil war, but the phenomenon of "staying behind" was undoubtedly one of the important factors that accelerated its defeat. Chen Cheng's experience in the northeast mentioned in the article exposes the tip of the iceberg of this chaos. From corps to corps, divisions, and even battalions and companies, officers at all levels have set up "left-behind offices" one after another, nominally to liaise with logistics and settle their families, but in fact they have become tools for them to embezzle corruption and accumulate wealth for profit.
These "stay-at-home offices" gradually evolved into private residences, guarded by soldiers and engaged in commercial activities. A large number of able-bodied soldiers who were supposed to fight on the front lines remained in the rear, serving their commanders and engaging in activities unrelated to the war. According to statistics, in Shenyang alone, there are more than 25,000 soldiers who spend their time in the "left-behind place", which is equivalent to the strength of an integrated division! Think about it, if these 25,000 people can be put into the battlefield, what impact will it have on the war situation?
2. The source of corruption: the distortion between money and life and death
Behind the phenomenon of "detention centers" is the temptation of money and the fear of death. During the war years, life and death were uncertain, and some officers made collecting money their primary goal in order to protect their own interests. They used the power in their hands to set up "stay-behind places", hoard supplies, and make a lot of war money. And those soldiers who were placed in the "stay-behind places" were also happy to enjoy this relatively safe life and escape the artillery fire on the front line.
This phenomenon reflected corruption and lax military discipline within the Kuomintang army. The officers disregarded the interests of the state and the nation and only cared about their own personal interests, which eventually led to a decline in the combat effectiveness and low morale of the army. As Chen Cheng said, "This is an action to dig into one's own wall, and it is doing the Communist Party a favor." ”
3. Influence and Reflection: A Warning Bell of History
The phenomenon of "detention centers" is not unique, and it reflects the corruption and decline of the Kuomintang regime. This corruption not only eroded the combat effectiveness of the army, but also exacerbated social contradictions, which eventually led to the collapse of the Kuomintang.
The lessons of history are worth pondering. The rise and fall of a regime is closely related to the degree of discipline in the army. If the army is corrupt, the country is in danger. Today, we should all the more strengthen the building of a clean and honest government, safeguard the discipline of the armed forces, and ensure the country's long-term peace and stability.
Multi-Perspective Discussion:
Institutional level: The KMT's lack of an effective oversight mechanism has led to abuse of power and fostered corruption.
Cultural level: At that time, the social atmosphere was corrupt and money worship was prevalent, which exacerbated the spread of corruption.
At the personal level: Some officers lack a sense of responsibility and mission, and only care about personal selfish interests, which ultimately destroys the interests of the country and the nation.
Case Study:
The Shenyang "Detention Center" incident mentioned in the article is a typical case. A large number of soldiers were stranded in the rear and engaged in activities unrelated to the war, which seriously weakened the combat effectiveness of the army.
Data Citation:
There are more than 25,000 soldiers in the "left-behind places" in Shenyang, and this number is enough to show the seriousness of the problem.
Question Guidance:
Is the emergence of the phenomenon of "left-behind places" a loophole in the system or a weakness of human nature?
How can we effectively prevent similar incidents from happening?
Expression of Opinions:
The phenomenon of "stay-at-home" is a microcosm of the corruption of the Kuomintang army, and it warns us that a strong country needs not only a strong military force, but also a clean and efficient government and a well-disciplined army.
Solution:
We should strengthen the building of systems, improve the supervisory mechanism, severely punish corrupt elements, improve the remuneration of military personnel, and enhance the sense of honor and responsibility of military personnel.
Epilogue:
The story of the "Detention Center" is a mirror that reflects the deep reasons for the defeat of the Kuomintang. It reminds us that corruption is the source of national ruin, and honesty is the foundation of national rejuvenation. I hope that readers and friends can think deeply about this history, learn lessons from it, and contribute to building a better future.
Readers are invited to discuss:
What do you think was the main reason for the defeat of the Kuomintang? In addition to the phenomenon of "stay-behind", what other factors led to the defeat of the Kuomintang? Feel free to leave a message in the comment section and share your views.
The original intention of this article is to spread positive energy, and there is no intention to infringe on the rights and interests of others. If there is any infringement, please contact us and we will actively cooperate with the handling.