For your better reading experience, click "Follow", and I will update you with entertainment information every day.
On September 20, an ordinary ride-hailing driver, with passengers, turned into law enforcement officers when they arrived at the station, demanding to see the driver's ID. The driver refused, as the woman was dressed in civilian clothes and was alone.
That's weird enough, isn't it? Next, the driver's account was blocked, which is not only a contest about documents, but also a contest of identity and power.
Here's the thing, the ride-hailing driver was asked to show his business ID by a female passenger claiming to be a staff member of the Transport Bureau after completing a normal passenger carrying task.
Although the lady was dressed in casual clothes, she went straight into law enforcement mode. The driver questioned this, after all, according to the regulations, law enforcement officers should wear uniform when performing official duties and should not act alone. Instead, the driver's skepticism was not explained, and instead, his ride-hailing account was banned, directly affecting his livelihood.
The female law enforcement officer did not actually belong to the transportation comprehensive administrative law enforcement detachment, which means that she is not qualified to enforce the law at all. What is even more troubling is that this is not the first time that such unidentified law enforcement has occurred.
In the past, in order to complete the task, transportation management personnel in some areas adopted the so-called "fishing law enforcement", and investigated and punished online car-hailing by hiring passengers, which has aroused widespread public skepticism.
This not only damaged the image of the government department, but also planted indelible doubts in the hearts of the public.
In this case, the driver had all the legal operating documents, but his legal rights and interests were disregarded in an instant. This begs the question, how can ride-hailing drivers protect their rights? How do they respond to unidentified law enforcement officers? While regulation is necessary, can the means and process of regulation ignore legal procedures and human rights?
Seeing this, you may think that my emotions are a little overdone. But think about it, how would we feel if this happened to you and me today? An ordinary ride-hailing driver is treated unfairly because of reasonable questioning, which is not only about a person's livelihood, but also about the legal environment of the whole society.
I was very puzzled and angry at the fact that the driver's legal rights were being disregarded, and the behavior of the lady who claimed to be a transportation officer made people question her motives for law enforcement. The seriousness of the law and the legitimacy of law enforcement seem to be regarded as child's play by some people here, which is a great challenge to social justice.
For the sake of a fairer and more transparent law enforcement environment, we must pay attention to and face up to such incidents. Improper law enforcement must not be allowed to become the norm, let alone the public must lose confidence in law enforcement.
After all, the authority of the law is not used to oppress citizens, but to protect the legitimate rights and interests of everyone. It is hoped that such incidents can be properly handled, and the driver will be given justice, and the public will be given a clear explanation.
What do you think about this? Feel free to leave a message in the comment area!