I estimated my score of 90 points, but the actual score was 71 points for three consecutive years, only one point short of the passing line.
Recently, a supervising candidate complained to the local 12345 hotline.
Content of the appeal
The claimant called to reflect: it has participated in the national registered supervision engineer examination for three consecutive years, and it has been 71 points for three consecutive years, only one point short of the passing line, and its assessment of its examination score is 90 points, but it does not understand why it is 71 points every time, so the call reflects, requiring the functional unit to review its scores, and requiring the functional units to publicize the total score of the department, the process of score review, the handler, and how to get the summary results, and hope that the functional units will conduct a fair and transparent way for the examination rescore, Please ask the functional unit to also review the exams it has taken in the past years, and ask the functional unit to verify and deal with it, thank you.
I suddenly remembered a candidate in the post bar who had been taking the exam for four years, and he was only two or three points short every year.
94 points in 2018, 92 points in 2019, 93 points in 2020, 94 points in 2021, and finally successfully landed with 96 points in the fifth year!
In the face of failing the exam, some people became more and more courageous, and kept taking the exam until they went ashore.
Some people have doubts and ask for a re-examination of the results.
There have been successes, but the probability is very small. In my impression, there is a second-class candidate who added 3 points, and a second-class candidate who deducted 4 points.
One case is a second-class candidate who added 3 points and passed the pass line after the reexamination
。
I am a Hunan 2020 second-class candidate.
After the results of my second-level cost engineer were rechecked and registered, the examination institute found that the original score of 58 points was wrong, and the actual score was 61 points. (At this time, the Changsha Human Resources and Social Security Bureau has already released the list of people who have passed the post-examination inspection), and then contacted the relevant staff and submitted the post-examination verification materials to Room 2205 of the Changsha Human Resources and Social Security Bureau. The staff only said to go back and pay attention to the online notification, even if it is possible.
There is also a case of a second-class construction candidate who was deducted 4 points after the re-examination
。
The candidate scored 29.5 points for objective questions and 39 points for subjective questions (total score of 68.5) before the review, and the total score changed to 64.5 after the review.
A month later, Hainan announced the qualification standard for the second construction in 22 years: 65 points for construction subjects......
Creation makes people!
V X public account: Civil Engineering Think Tank A large number of architectural materials are waiting for you! Note that it is an official account!