laitimes

Less than a month after her visit, Hasina resigned and fled Bangladesh, not India

Recently, a very shocking event happened in South Asia, the 77-year-old who served as the prime minister of Bangladesh four times in 1996, 2009, 2014 and 2019, and was elected prime minister for the fifth time in January 2024, has officially resigned as the prime minister of Bangladesh a few days ago and fled Bangladesh by plane. It is worth noting that just as Hasina's helicopter left Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, a large crowd of people rushed into the official residence of the Bangladeshi prime minister. It can be seen that Hasina's successful escape this time can be said to be very thrilling.

Less than a month after her visit, Hasina resigned and fled Bangladesh, not India

After Hasina resigned and left, the Bangladesh Army Chief of Staff Zaman made a public statement saying that an interim government would be formed to govern Bangladesh. Therefore, outside analysts pointed out that what happened in Bangladesh this time is likely to be a "mutiny".

Less than a month after her visit, Hasina resigned and fled Bangladesh, not India

It is worth noting that just at the beginning of last month, Hasina just came to China for a friendly visit, and during the visit, she also reached a series of relevant cooperation agreements with the Chinese side, involving infrastructure construction, economic and trade investment, medical care and education, etc., during the visit, Hasina also publicly stated that Bangladesh will continue to actively participate in the "Belt and Road" cooperation. As a result, on August 5, less than a month after Hasina returned to China after her visit to China, Hasina had to resign from the post of prime minister of Bangladesh, which she had served for many years.

Less than a month after her visit, Hasina resigned and fled Bangladesh, not India

So, is there a "pusher" behind this happening in Bangladesh, and if there is really a "pusher", then what kind of "pusher" is it? Regarding this doubt, we can first rule out India. Because Bangladesh is adjacent to India's landscape, the relationship between the two countries has always been relatively close, and Hasina herself has a good relationship with India. Even after her visit, Hasina said she would give India a "priority" to the Teesta project, which is of great concern to all parties. In addition, after the incident, it was the India Air Force that sent a helicopter to take Hasina away from the Bangladeshi capital Dhaka, and Hasina has now fled to India. It can be seen that India may not have anything to do with the anti-Hasina activities in Bangladesh.

Less than a month after her visit, Hasina resigned and fled Bangladesh, not India

So since it's not India, who will it be? Here, we cannot but think of the fact that in May this year, Hasina publicly criticized United States for "interfering in Bangladesh's internal affairs." According to Hasina herself, on the occasion of Bangladesh's last prime minister's election, "a white man from a certain country proposed that if I allowed the country to set up an air base in Bangladesh, he would guarantee me an easy re-election." The outside world generally believes that the "certain country" in Hasina's mouth refers to the United States. In other words, United States once hoped to establish a military base in Bangladesh, but Hasina sternly refused. It is also reported that the opposition in Bangladesh and their sons are now living in United Kingdom for a long time.

Less than a month after her visit, Hasina resigned and fled Bangladesh, not India
Less than a month after her visit, Hasina resigned and fled Bangladesh, not India

Generally speaking, Hasina maintains good relations with India and conducts economic cooperation with China, which may indeed cause dissatisfaction among some countries with bad intentions. Of course, we do not have conclusive evidence as to who is behind the "mutiny" in Bangladesh, but I believe that everyone will have their own judgment.

Read on