Reporter: Shenhua has appealed to the controversial penalty Is the 14 Super League seats an ornament?

Let's go live

2024-08-05 21:06Posted on the official account of Live Bar in United States

Live broadcast on August 5 According to the team reporter Gan Hui, Shenhua Club has filed a complaint against the controversial penalty in the Beijing-Shanghai battle.

Gan Hui revealed on social media that she wrote:

Today, Shenhua returned to Shanghai from Beijing to prepare for the upcoming match, and the club also appealed the controversial penalty in the Beijing-Shanghai match.

The controversial decision in this game focused on the referee's blowing penalty for offside. In the 47th minute and 49 seconds, Gao Tianyi made a long pass from the right rib of the midfielder, and Luis shot low on the right side of the penalty area after winning the ball, calmly scoring the ball. After a three-minute check, VAR ruled that Luis was offside and the goal was disallowed.

In stoppage time, Ngadewu went straight into the middle circle, Zhang Xizhe crossed the middle line and turned a wonderful pass, and the substitute Wang Ziming hit the ball into the far corner after deducting the Shenhua defender on the right side of the penalty area. VAR looked at it for almost four minutes and gave a valid penalty for the goal.

However, the picture provided by the public broadcast signal did not give a clear basis for the penalty, so the outside world questioned the referee team's decision.

First of all, Luiz's goal for Shenhua, although the public broadcast signal gave a line, but the picture did not show the moment of Gao Tianyi's goal, so this line is meaningless. As we all know, to determine whether to be offside or not, it depends on the moment of Gao Tianyi's ball, the position of Shenhua's offensive players and Guoan defenders.

Secondly, the goal in stoppage time of Guoan, the public broadcast signal did not even draw the offside line, which is even more confusing.

Relevant information shows that there are 11 seats in the standard game of the Chinese Super League, 14 in the focus game, and the addition of net ports and three-dimensional cableway systems (flying cats). The Beijing-Shanghai battle has always been the highlight of the Chinese Super League, and it is naturally the configuration of the focus game.

In addition, according to the relevant regulations of the Chinese Super League, each game is equipped with a dedicated offside position, but it is puzzling that the VAR crossing ruling only uses a side position that does not include the moment of the ball, which is obviously unconvincing. Is the configuration of the 14 cameras and the offside position an ornament? And this is not the first time that a similar situation has happened in the Chinese Super League.

Competitive sports are open, fair and impartial, and if they are not upheld, competitions will be meaningless. Therefore, the relevant functional departments need to give Shenhua an explanation and an explanation to the public.

According to the rules, the referee shall organize a review of the appeal submitted by the club in a timely manner and make a conclusion within 72 hours after the end of all matches in the round, and inform the complaining club by email. This is the second time this season that Shenhua FC has appealed a controversial decision, and regardless of the final outcome of the review, the outcome of the game cannot be changed.

View original image 126K

• 

• 

•