Collective hexagram? ASML and Netherlands lithography machine suppliers have spoken out one after another, and foreign media are amazed: things are getting bigger!
Support the author, it is not easy to write, there will be 5s advertisements in the text, and you can read the full text for free after watching it~
On the big stage of the global semiconductor industry, the technology blockade policy of the United States and Western countries is like a well-planned contest, and the target is directly aimed at the rapidly developing Chinese science and technology field. The United States and its allies have come up with a bunch of drastic measures to prevent China from making further progress in advanced chips with semiconductor technology. From the cut off of raw material supply to the refusal of high-end manufacturing equipment from export, this blockade has blocked almost every part of the semiconductor industry chain. But just like playing chess, these strategies are not just simple confrontations, there are also a lot of calculations and practical considerations in them.
The Routine and Status Quo of Technological Blockade: Why the United States and the West Are "Stuck"
At the beginning of the blockade of the United States and Western countries, the global technology industry became nervous. Key players such as ASML in the Netherlands, Nikon and Canon in Japan have been forced to choose sides between China and the United States. In the face of United States pressure and the attractiveness of the Chinese market, the choice of these companies is like walking on the edge of a cliff. However, the actual effect of this "neck" strategy is not clear. The complete blockade of the Chinese market not only failed to stop China's technological progress, but also exposed the weakness of the US and Western policies. Like a gust of wind blowing through the global technology field, this blockade policy not only did not cut off China's technological chain, but revealed many problems and contradictions when it was implemented.
For example, United States sanctions restrict China from obtaining the most advanced lithography machines, but the global semiconductor industry chain is complex and interdependent, which makes the blockade a little weak. The technological blockade of the United States and the West not only did not stop China's scientific and technological development, but also made China work harder to engage in independent innovation in the field of semiconductors to a certain extent. The struggle between enterprises and countries has slowly turned into more complex technological competition and market grabbing.
As lockdowns have progressed, attitudes in global markets have changed. This technological blockade has not only exposed the worries of the United States and Western countries about the rise of China's science and technology, but also exposed the problems and shortcomings in their implementation of their strategies. In this international battle, China's scientific and technological progress and market strategy have slowly become key factors, attracting more people's attention and discussion.
The effectiveness of this strategy and the reaction of the global market is the focus of the following sections. The change in the attitude of the US and Western allies and the changes in the global market will further clarify the full picture and future direction of this technological war. You will find that behind the technological blockade is a complex and conflicting global chess game.
Allies shaken: ASML and the global market's changing attitude
In the fierce battle in the global semiconductor field, ASML in the Netherlands is a prominent role. It is the only company in the world that can produce extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines, and its every move can impact the international market. However, even if the United States and Western countries have a strong technology blockade on China, the attitude of ASML and its global partners is particularly complex and dramatic, and we can see the subtle role and strategic adjustment of enterprises in the great power game.
The pressure on ASML from the United States and the West is like an invisible "trapped" game. The U.S. wants to stop ASML from selling lithography machines to China, and this policy looks quite tough, but there are actually a lot of mistakes. After a moment of silence, ASML's attitude changed dramatically. The previous firmness is slowly becoming clearer, especially at the end of 2023, when ASML suddenly accelerated its recruitment and said that it would speed up technology research and development. Behind these actions, it can be seen that it attaches importance to the Chinese market, as well as a real reaction to United States pressure. ASML's change in attitude makes people feel that it can't stand being "stuck" by the United States and begins to look at the opportunities and challenges of the global market again.
It is also interesting to see the actions of KMWE, ASML's upstream supplier. KMWE said it would build a 3D printing equipment factory in China, which is a very powerful move for the technology competition between China and the United States. As an important supplier to ASML, KMWE's decision is not only confident in the Chinese market, but also a careful balance between international companies in the confrontation between China and the United States. KMWE's decision is a sign that more international companies are starting to re-see the potential of the mainland market, especially in the context of technological lockdowns, a shift that is particularly important.
The changing attitudes of ASML and its partners illustrate the struggles of global technology companies in the face of great power pressure. Enterprises have to consider external pressures from the United States and the West; On the other hand, it has to deal with the great opportunities and development potential of the Chinese market. In this battle, enterprises are not only passively following, but also actively adjusting their strategies. ASML's repeated attitude has not only affected the situation of chip competition between China and the United States, but also made people see the complex role of technology companies in the international affairs economy.
This change in attitude is not accidental, but is the result of the deep interweaving of the global technology industry chain. When technology companies weigh the pressures of the United States and the West and the interests of the Chinese market, they are faced with not only business decisions, but also serious thinking about the future strategic direction. The choice of ASML and its partners has directly affected the supply and demand of the global semiconductor market, and has also changed the technology blockade policy.
This change in the situation not only makes people curious about the future of chip competition between China and the United States, but also makes people see the complexity in the field of technology. Next, how will this change in attitudes continue to impact the global tech market? Will other countries and enterprises follow suit and further change the layout of technology and market? The answers to these questions, we will continue later, the whole picture of the global scientific and technological battle is slowly becoming clear, and more strategic competition and market changes are waiting to be discovered.
Divergent market choices: More and more foreign companies are leaning towards China
The technological blockade of China's technology industry by the United States and the West is becoming more and more severe, and the choice of the global market has become more complicated. International companies are making profound strategic adjustments in this chess game of technology and market. In particular, the investment of KMWE, ASML's upstream supplier, in China is clearly a major change in market attitude. This change not only shows that companies are increasingly looking at the Chinese market, but also exposes the increasingly obvious divergence in the global technology industry chain.
In recent years, the United States and its allies have imposed a multi-layered technology blockade on China, trying to suppress China's semiconductor industry by restricting the export of high-end manufacturing equipment, key raw materials and top technology. However, these measures did not stop China's development as expected, and caused a series of reactions in the global market. More and more international companies are starting to re-see the importance of the mainland market and gradually prefer to cooperate with China. This change is a major change in the global technology industry chain, and it also makes people see the other side of the technology blockade policy.
KMWE is saying that it will build a 3D printing equipment factory in China, which has attracted a lot of attention in the international market. As an important supplier to ASML, KMWE's decision was not taken lightly, but was a recognition of the potential of the Chinese market. 3D printing technology is increasingly being used, especially in high-tech manufacturing and custom manufacturing, and KMWE's investment demonstrates confidence in the Chinese market. When international companies choose markets, they slowly regard China as a growth point that they cannot afford to pay attention to, and are willing to take risks to find cooperation opportunities even if there is a technological blockade.
And this trend is not only a strategic adjustment of enterprises, but also a series of reactions in the global technology industry chain. More and more international companies are beginning to look at the mainland market, and even under pressure from the United States and Western countries, they still choose to invest and cooperate in China. Whether it's a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, a technology service provider or a material supplier, more and more companies understand that the Chinese market is not only a large consumer market, but also a place where there are many opportunities for technological innovation.
This divergence in market choice deeply reflects the strategic adjustment and practical considerations of international companies in the Sino-US technology battle. Under the pressure of the technological blockade between the United States and the West, enterprises are faced with a dilemma: should they continue to be pressed by the technological blockade, or should they seek cooperation and development in the Chinese market? This strategic adjustment is not only for the sake of business interests, but also to grasp the future trends of science and technology. China is an important player in the global technology industry, and its market potential and innovation capabilities have attracted more and more international companies.
Behind this trend, it is not only enterprises re-evaluating market opportunities, but also the beginning of the re-layout of the global technology industry chain. Under the pressure of the technological blockade between the United States and the West, the Chinese market has risen and has become a new growth point and cooperation center for the technology industry. This divergence in market choice also indicates that the pattern of technological competition will change in the future.
It is worth paying attention to how to look at the changes in market choice and its impact on the global technology industry and international relations. The choices and strategic adjustments of all parties in the global scientific and technological battle are reshaping the international market pattern. It is worth talking about the challenges and opportunities that this profound market change will bring to the future development of the technology industry.
The backlash of technological hegemony: the redistribution of global influence
The United States and Western countries pursued hegemonic policies in the global science and technology field, and in the past, they were like sharp knives, trying to make themselves more powerful in the international community through sanctions and blockades. However, when these policies were implemented, everyone saw that this "hegemony" not only did not increase its influence, but also exposed its own short-sightedness and limitations. It's like shooting yourself in the foot, which makes it difficult for United States and its allies to stand on the international table.
The hegemony of science and technology was originally intended to restrict the development of other countries, especially China, through technological control and market blockade. But the actual effect is far less than expected. The blockade by the United States and Western countries has not stopped China's scientific and technological progress, but has made China work harder to innovate and develop faster in the field of semiconductors. The rearrangement of the global technology industry chain has also exposed the inaccuracy and poor implementation of science and technology control by the United States and the West.
As a result, the global market is increasingly averse to technological hegemony, and more countries and companies are looking for opportunities to open up and cooperate. This trend is obvious, especially in the field of science and technology, more and more international companies and countries prefer to cooperate with China, and are no longer willing to be controlled by US and Western technology. The "backlash" of scientific and technological hegemony has made people see that the global scientific and technological landscape has changed, international relations have been redefined, and everyone wants scientific and technological cooperation.
This change indicates that there are new trends and challenges in the future scientific and technological competition. The global science and technology landscape has changed from unilateralism to multilateral cooperation, and open cooperation in the field of science and technology has gradually become the mainstream. The international community is disgusted with scientific and technological hegemony and wants to cooperate fairly, which will become an important driving force for future scientific and technological competition.
This trend not only shows that the policy of scientific and technological hegemony is not working, but also opens up new possibilities for international scientific and technological cooperation. In the future, it is worth paying attention to how the global science and technology field will be rebuilt, and how countries will find balance and cooperation in scientific and technological innovation. How will the tech industry respond to this big change in the future? Where is technology going next, and will there be more cooperation and openness?
Welcome everyone to leave a message and talk about the possibilities and challenges of future scientific and technological development. Come and talk in the comment area!
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or personal infringement, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.