If you think it's good, just click "Follow".
Copywriting丨No. 8 drama fans are online
Editor丨Fans of the No. 8 drama are online
Djordjevic left class, and after Guo Shiqiang temporarily became the head coach of the men's basketball team, he led the team to a 0-5 warm-up game.
Previously, Qiao Shuai was sneered at by the media when he got out of class, and now in contrast, fans are beginning to miss Qiao Shuai.
It was revealed that Qiao Shuai was reluctant to communicate with the Chinese coaching staff, and now it seems that it may be due to the gap in ideas between the two sides.
Qiao Shuai watched the CBA and was not unconcerned, while fans and media people were controversial about the player's selection.
Guo Shiqiang gave up Qiao Shuai's favored players, but the reuse of his descendants did not work well.
Qiao Shuai led the team to have tactics, but the players did not execute effectively, and Guo Shiqiang took office with chaotic tactics.
The dilemma of the men's basketball team in the warm-up game is prominent, or it may be related to the rhythmic media people.
Basketball is supposed to uphold the principle of ability first, but in reality, we see a tendency to confuse institutional standards.
This is not to accuse a coach of incompetence, but to reveal that the Chinese men's basketball team has entered a cycle of decline, and its tragic situation has been exposed.
In a series of recent warm-up games, the performance of the Chinese men's basketball team can be described as dismal.
A year later, they lost again to the Macau Black Bears, and the situation was even worse than when they lost to the Philippines a year ago.
What's even more shocking is that the men's basketball team even lost to the provincial team in the game, which is undoubtedly a great irony of the existing coach evaluation system.
There is often a double standard when people evaluate coaches, giving credit to the coach when they win and players or other factors when they lose.
The loss to the provincial team this time undoubtedly makes this double-standard evaluation particularly glaring.
In the face of such a dilemma, we have to think deeply about the problems existing in the Chinese men's basketball team.
In the process of preparing for the Olympic Games, the men's basketball team relied too much on the old players and neglected the cultivation of young talents.
This strategy not only weakens the vitality of the team, but also hinders the injection of fresh blood.
The men's basketball team seems to be backward in terms of ideology, and does not dare to boldly use young people, but pays too much attention to seniority.
This conservative concept of employing people undoubtedly limits the development space of the team.
Against this backdrop, we compared the coaching styles and results of the two coaches.
Djordjevic, a coach who dares to use youngsters, has a tactical system in which youngsters are given more opportunities to show what they are capable of.
Under his leadership, the team was able to play a smooth passing and cutting coordination, showing a certain combat effectiveness.
In stark contrast to this is Guo Shiqiang's coaching style.
He prefers to use experienced veterans and is more conservative with younger players.
This strategy led to a chaotic appearance of the team in the game, lacking a clear tactical system.
Even in some competitions, young players are not even eligible to participate, which is undoubtedly a great waste of talent resources.
When discussing the difference between Djordjevic and Guo Shiqiang's coaching, we have to mention the exchange between Qiao Shuai and the Chinese coaching staff.
Qiao Shuai was reluctant to communicate too much with the Chinese coaching staff during his tenure, which affected the overall coordination of the team to a certain extent.
This does not mean that Qiao Shuai lacks attention to the CBA.
On the contrary, he has been keeping an eye on the development of the league and picking young players with potential from it.
But unfortunately, fans and media people often misunderstand this, thinking that he does not know enough about the actual situation of Chinese basketball.
Guo Shiqiang's problems in employing personnel and tactics are also worthy of in-depth discussion.
His tactical system is relatively conservative and relies too much on the performance of his veteran players.
In the game, teams often appear to lack creativity and adaptability.
As a result, young players are rarely able to get opportunities in his system, which undoubtedly limits the long-term development of the team.
Djordjevic was out of class, and the news that Guo Shiqiang was temporarily the head coach of the men's basketball team attracted widespread attention.
Qiao Shuai's dismissal caused "cheers" from media people to some extent, but this cannot hide the deep-seated problems of the Chinese men's basketball team.
After Guo Shiqiang took over, the team's performance in the warm-up game was even more dismal, with a 0-5 record that made people worry about the future of the men's basketball team.
In the warm-up game, the Chinese men's basketball team exposed the problems of backward tactics and weak basic skills.
The team was unable to form an effective confrontation with the opponent during the game.
The misleading remarks of the media people also affected the morale of the team to a certain extent.
They rhythmically blame coaches and players, but ignore the root cause of the decline of the men's basketball team.
From the strategy to the tactical system, from the coaching team to the media environment, it is necessary to carry out in-depth reflection and reform.
In this process, we should always adhere to the principle of the supremacy of the ability of basketball competition, and abandon the practice of mixing system standards.
The decline of the Chinese men's basketball team is not only a decline in game performance, but also a signal that the entire basketball culture and system need to be deeply reflected.
In this information age, the application of data and technology has penetrated into various industries, and basketball is no exception.
We seem to be lagging behind in this regard, not taking full advantage of modern technology to optimize training, games and player management.
For example, sports data analysis, biomechanical studies, and monitoring of mental states are all indispensable parts of modern basketball training.
In the training of the Chinese men's basketball team, the application of these high-tech means is obviously not widespread and in-depth enough.
We lack an accurate grasp of the individual characteristics of our players and are unable to tailor the most appropriate training plan for them.
The rise of social media and online platforms has provided players and coaches with more opportunities to communicate with the outside world, but it has also brought new challenges.
Various voices on the Internet, whether positive encouragement or negative criticism, can have an impact on the psychology of the players.
In this era of information explosion, how to maintain the focus and concentration of the players and coaching team, and not be affected by the disturbances of the outside world, is another important problem that the Chinese men's basketball team needs to solve.
In addition, our youth training system is also in urgent need of reform.
Under the current system, many young players with potential are not fully developed and presented for various reasons.
Some local teams are too focused on short-term results, ignoring the growth cycle and psychological needs of young players.
This has led to the death of many outstanding seedlings on the road to success, and they cannot provide fresh blood for the Chinese men's basketball team.
The revival of the Chinese men's basketball team was not achieved overnight.
We need to start from many aspects, including but not limited to the innovation of the tactical system, the introduction of scientific and technological means, the adjustment of the psychological state and the improvement of the youth training system.
Only by comprehensively and systematically promoting these reforms can the Chinese men's basketball team regain its vitality and move towards new glory.
In this process, adhering to the principle of the supremacy of basketball competition and abandoning all formalism and bureaucracy is the bottom line that we must adhere to.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.