Many times, when we pay attention to social news and see some news, we really need a strong heart, otherwise we really can't stand it.
If you remember, a similar phenomenon has happened in the courts.
At that time, what I remember most is that the notice given was that "the legal awareness is weak", and sometimes seeing such a notice really makes people feel quite helpless.
As a professional in the legal profession, as a staff member of the public security and judicial system, I don't know what everyone thinks when these people say that they have a weak sense of law.
In addition, some time ago, there was another piece of news that also made a lot of noise, at the scene of the trial, there was a judge remote command.
Staff members are asked to interrupt lawyers' speeches and to be tough.
At that time, the chat record of this scene happened to be filmed by the lawyer, but what made people feel more magical.
The evidence captured by the lawyer is invalid because it is not allowed to be filmed.
Then the problem arises, if the lawyer does not bring a mobile phone, he will not be able to take evidence, and if he does, it will violate the law.
If you think about this question carefully, you will feel that you have an answer in mind that there is a standard for judging things.
In the past two days, a video has been circulating on the Internet, which has caused controversy among many netizens, and the cause of the incident is not complicated.
An extortion case was being heard at the court, and a local public official, Lu, defrauded four people of 800,000 yuan on the grounds of introducing a project.
Four people want to find out that they have been deceived. To get back the 800,000 yuan he was cheated of, of course Lu didn't give it.
So the four of them said that they would go to the Commission for Discipline Inspection to report, but the specific details were not announced by the media.
As a result, the four people who were defrauded of 800,000 yuan are now prosecuted for extortion.
In fact, we have seen a lot of similar things in the social news, Luo Xiang once told a classic case, in the fourth year, a female college student spent more than 10,000 yuan to buy a laptop, and the laptop was a defective product, so she asked for compensation, and the company sued the female college student for extortion.
At that time, there was a lot of uproar in the society, but the media carried out follow-up reports for many days, and now the situation is according to the Internet video and comprehensive media.
He Zhijuan and other lawyers appeared in court to defend themselves, and the procuratorate added a new prosecutor to appear in court.
The lawyer asked to see the notice of dispatch to appear in court and make a copy, and the presiding judge handed the document to the lawyer for inspection, saying that it could only be copied after the trial.
The result was reversed, and for some reason, the promised good thing, the court suddenly changed its mind.
The presiding judge said that he had not said that it could be copied, and even if he did, it would be a slip of the tongue, so the two sides communicated.
This matter is simply that there is a sudden extra person in the courtroom, and the lawyer wants to be able to check on the sudden appearance of this person.
Unreasonable, unreasonable, or in accordance with the requirements of the law.
The court said yes, you can check it.
After saying this, he immediately changed his hexagram when he was resting.
Why did it suddenly change hexagrams? This question is a matter of opinion, and wisdom is the opinion of the wise.
As a legal practitioner, in such a solemn court scene, if you say that you change your hexagram, you will change your hexagram, and what you said before will not count in the blink of an eye.
The lawyer expressed doubts and picked up his mobile phone to make a video recording of the scene.
At this time, the most widely circulated and discussed video clips appeared on the Internet, and the bailiffs strongly demanded that the video be deleted.
And began to snatch the lawyer's mobile phone, seven or eight bailiffs swarmed up, and some people pulled the lawyer's arm.
After a series of "physical contacts", the lawyer eventually collapsed to the ground.
Is this complicated?
It's quite simple, not to mention at the scene of the court's trial, even if you go to a private enterprise, the front desk will ask, who are you looking for, who are you?
The lawyer was denied after questioning, and after refusal, he was controlled.
Not only that, but the court also forced the lawyer to delete the video in his hand.
We have all heard a saying among the people, which is called being upright and not afraid of shadows, in such a solemn court scene.
Why didn't you dare to make the video public during the trial and mediation?
As for it, seven or eight bailiffs rushed up, giving people an intuitive feeling that it was nothing more than because of the lawyer's questioning, causing the court staff to feel that they had been offended and their dignity had been offended.
How can you, a lawyer, be embarrassed to question openly, and you can't tell the difference between the "big and small kings".
From another point of view, in a place where the court talks about the law, what kind of intuitive feeling is it that someone is asked to delete the video publicly, and even the video materials are not even allowed to be disclosed, and they have to be deleted?
What will make everyone think?
We often hear that there are laws to follow, and violations must be arrested, and we hope that these sentences can be put in place.
It would be a disaster if the legal professionals of the courts showed a weak sense of the rule of law when dealing with problems.
The fairness and justice of the law is the simple vision of all people, and this video can cause huge discussions and hot searches on the Internet.
It's definitely traceable.