This article is only published in Toutiao, and the articles on other platforms are counterfeit for your better reading experience, click "Follow", and I will update you with entertainment information every day.
When you hear such a title, are you full of curiosity and doubt? Li Xueqin, an artist who is loved and concerned by everyone, what kind of "melon" does she have? And why is it said that it was already dealt with 11 years ago? What's the story behind this? Is it an unknown experience, or is it a misunderstanding buried by time?
In the following time, let's dig deeper, unveil this mysterious "melon" together, and see what kind of inspiration and thinking it can bring us. Perhaps through this topic, we can have a more comprehensive understanding of Li Xueqin, and we can also have a new understanding and perception of various phenomena in the entertainment industry. Let's wait and see!
Li Xueqin graduated from Peking University, which should be a capital she is proud of, and it is also one of the important reasons why many fans appreciate her. However, when this educational background is put in the spotlight of public opinion, various voices of skepticism follow. Fortunately, the students of Peking University and the official blog support group have spoken out one after another, proving the authenticity of their academic qualifications.
They used their own personal experience and knowledge of the school system to defend Li Xueqin and try to calm the turmoil. But this seems to be only one aspect of the incident, because the subsequent posting of her second-level swimming license by netizens pushed the controversy to a new climax.
This has to mention an important background, that is, the fraud of extra scores in the college entrance examination in Benxi, Liaoning Province 11 years ago. At that time, the incident was strictly investigated, and the society paid great attention to the fairness and transparency of the extra points in the college entrance examination. And Li Xueqin's college entrance examination results and enrollment situation that year also became the focus of everyone's attention at this time.
In the discussion of netizens on the authenticity of Li Xueqin's swimming license, various opinions and comments emerged one after another. Some netizens believe that even if the fraud is indeed a fraud, it is not used in the end, so there is no need to pursue it too much. This view is that even if there is a problem with the certificate, if it does not play a role in the actual college entrance examination, then the impact on the outcome is minimal.
Some netizens also pointed out that these things were organized by the school and had been dealt with back then. They felt that in the environment at that time, there might have been some operational improprieties in the school, but since it had been dealt with accordingly, it was not much point to go through the old accounts now.
Some netizens believe that students often don't have much choice in such an environment, they may have passively accepted the school's arrangement, and they didn't profit from it, and it is really unnecessary to hold on to their pigtails now.
Is that really the case? Let's think deeper. The college entrance examination, as an important system for selecting and promoting talents on the mainland, brooks no encroachment on its fairness. Every extra point should be true and fair, otherwise it will be a great injustice to those candidates who work hard with their own efforts and real results. Even though Li Xueqin may not have entered Peking University with extra points in swimming, the act of certificate fraud itself is worthy of our reflection.
If such behavior is easily let go, does it send the wrong signal that others feel that the violation can be forgiven as long as it does not ultimately cause a material impact? Or will this further reduce the public's trust in the college entrance examination bonus system, thus affecting the cornerstone of educational equity as a whole?
Of course, some people will say that the past will let it pass, and Li Xueqin's achievements in the entertainment industry now also prove her ability. But can this really be a reason for us to ignore the problem?
The controversy over Li Xueqin's academic qualifications and the swimming incident has a wide range and depth of influence, far beyond the personal level. This is by no means just a matter of Li Xueqin alone, but a severe test of a series of important values such as educational fairness and social integrity.
Equity in education is the cornerstone of social equity. The college entrance examination, as a key way for tens of millions of students to change their fate, does not allow for the slightest discount in its fairness. Every extra point and every admission criterion should be fair, transparent and stand up to scrutiny. Li Xueqin's swimming incident, whether or not it actually benefited from the admission process, has raised public doubts about the mechanism of adding points to the college entrance examination.
If such incidents occur frequently and are not properly addressed, how will the efforts of those students who study day and night and work hard with real talent and hard work be measured? Where will their belief in fair play go?
Social integrity is the core element of maintaining the normal operation of society. If a society loses its integrity, trust between people will collapse and social order will fall into chaos. In Li Xueqin's case, the authenticity of the swimming license and the various operations that may be involved behind it have touched the bottom line of social integrity. This not only makes the public question the integrity of individuals, but may also lead to a shake of confidence in the integrity system of society as a whole.
How exactly should we view this event? Rationality and objectivity need to be maintained. Conclusions cannot be drawn on the basis of one-sided statements or unsubstantiated anecdotes. It is necessary to conduct an in-depth investigation to understand the whole picture and the truth of the incident. At the same time, we should also examine whether our own over-pursuit of celebrities and success affects our judgment of the facts.
So, how to maintain the fairness and justice of the college entrance examination? This needs to start from the institutional level, strengthen the review and supervision of the college entrance examination bonus points, and ensure that each extra point has a sufficient basis and a strict review process. At the same time, it is necessary to intensify information disclosure, so that the entire process of college entrance examination admission is placed under the sun and subject to social supervision. Violations must be seriously investigated and dealt with, and will not be tolerated, so as to serve as a warning.
And for past mistakes, we can't simply choose to forget or ignore. It is necessary to learn lessons from this, improve the system, and prevent similar problems from happening again; It is also necessary to think about how to avoid excessive punishment in the process of correcting mistakes, so as to not only safeguard fairness and justice, but also give the parties a chance to reform themselves.
I am afraid that this controversy will not be able to settle down in a short period of time, and it will certainly trigger more discussion and reflection. Because it involves the fundamental values of society and the vital interests of the public. We hope that through these discussions and reflections, we can promote social progress, make education more equitable, and let the light of integrity shine in every corner.