laitimes

The pension was raised by 3%, the old people in the city are happy, the old people in the countryside don't feel it, don't forget the farmers!

In this fast-paced society, every piece of news and every policy adjustment is like a pebble thrown into a lake, stirring up layers of ripples. Recently, the pension increase policy has become a hot topic again. Someone said: "The pension is raised by 3%, the old people in the city are happy, the old people in the countryside don't feel it, don't forget the farmers." This sentence pierced our hearts like a thorn.

Yes, there is a world of difference between the living conditions of the elderly in the city and the elderly in the countryside. For the elderly in the city, the pension may be the guarantee of their elegant old age, and the income of seven or eight thousand a month, an increase of 3%, means that they can choose travel, health care or enjoy a better quality of life more freely. The 3% increase is undoubtedly a timely rain for them, nourishing their later life.

The pension was raised by 3%, the old people in the city are happy, the old people in the countryside don't feel it, don't forget the farmers!

However, what about the elderly in the countryside? A pension of a few hundred yuan a month, an increase of 3%, is just a drop in the bucket. Many of them still need to work in the fields, using their calloused hands in exchange for food and clothing. The 3% increase is almost negligible for them.

This gap reminds people of the old saying: "People are more popular than people." But here, we are not trying to compare whose life is better, but to think: Why does the same policy bring so different feelings to different people?

The pension was raised by 3%, the old people in the city are happy, the old people in the countryside don't feel it, don't forget the farmers!

"I'd rather not grow up myself, and I hope to give a unified pension to the old farmers!" The voice of a netizen expressed the hearts of many people. This is not only a desire for fairness, but also a recognition and respect for the hard work of farmers. The peasants, as the cornerstone of the country, have grown our rations with sweat and hard work, but they often do not get the security they deserve in their old age.

Someone proposed: "Give 1,000 yuan to people over 60 years old across the country, regardless of urban and rural areas." It's a simple proposal, but it contains a deep desire for fairness. Should we consider that every elderly person, whether in urban or rural areas, should have access to basic livelihood security?

The pension was raised by 3%, the old people in the city are happy, the old people in the countryside don't feel it, don't forget the farmers!

"No matter how good the policy is, it has nothing to do with the farmers." This sentence reveals the helplessness and disappointment of the elderly in rural areas with the existing policies. What they feel is not only economic pressure, but also the psychological trauma of being ignored and marginalized.

"After retirement, the pension should be unified, as in foreign countries." This is a bold proposal, but it also reflects the desire for fairness in the pension system. Should we learn from the experience of foreign countries to provide equal and adequate old-age security for every elderly person?

The pension was raised by 3%, the old people in the city are happy, the old people in the countryside don't feel it, don't forget the farmers!

"Farmers are the hardest, hardest-working, most paying, and most contributing!" This is a compliment to the peasants and a tribute to them. They have provided us with abundant food and have made a great contribution to the stability and development of the country. But are they getting the care they deserve in their later years?

We cannot ignore this issue, let alone turn a blind eye to the efforts of farmers. The reform of the pension system is not only an economic issue, but also an issue related to fairness, justice and humanity.

The pension was raised by 3%, the old people in the city are happy, the old people in the countryside don't feel it, don't forget the farmers!

We should reflect on why the same policy will bring such different feelings to the elderly in urban and rural areas. Is there still some blind spot in our policy that we need to discover and correct? Have we really achieved "the old have something to support and rely on"?

Of course, reforming the pension system is not an overnight thing, it requires us to conduct in-depth research, scientific planning, and steady progress. But in any case, we should work in the direction of fairness and unity.

The pension was raised by 3%, the old people in the city are happy, the old people in the countryside don't feel it, don't forget the farmers!

Finally, I would like to ask you a question: how do you think we should reform the pension system to ensure that every elderly person can enjoy fair and adequate pension security? At the same time, I also hope that everyone can actively express their views and opinions, and let us work together to build a fairer and more harmonious society!

In short, it is not only the responsibility of the government to pay attention to the pension of the elderly in rural areas, but also the obligation of each of us. Let's work together to create a better living environment for the elderly in rural areas!

Read on