Ladies and gentlemen! Before reading this article, move your little hands to make a fortune to like, follow, and comment on the editor!
The woman spent 30,000 yuan to invite the confinement sister-in-law, and the 15-day-old baby was slapped 3 times. The platform says it is not responsible! The police have intervened
Ms. Yang, a mother in Chengdu, Sichuan, spent 30,000 yuan to hire a senior confinement sister-in-law, Li, on the 58.com platform.
In the early morning of May 15, Bao's mother heard the child crying, and when she checked the surveillance, she found that Li was beating the child and slapped him 3 times in a row. Li said that because he was in a bad mood, he hit the child without holding back.
Ms. Yang called the police, and then Li was taken away by the police for investigation, and took the child to the hospital for examination, but fortunately there was no major problem. Ms. Yang contacted the 58.com platform for after-sales, and the platform said that the platform was not responsible.
Ms. Yang has entrusted a lawyer to prepare to sue Yuesao Li and the 58.com platform to protect her rights through legal means. The incident caused heated discussions among netizens on the Internet.
Loading...
Netizens are hotly discussed
Netizens have commented on their opinions, and some people lamented why they let their parents and mothers-in-law take care of their children. Some people say that confinement is just an example.
Some netizens said: Today's young people don't believe in their families, and would rather spend a high price to hire a confinement lady, live in a confinement center, and believe in outsiders. At least the family will not hit the child
Some netizens mentioned: Take a 24-hour wage, don't do this job if you don't have that temperament. Taking care of a baby is a delicate job, and the confinement lady is not only smashing her own job
Some netizens said: With this 20,000 yuan, it is better to give it to your mother or mother-in-law, they will still read you, and it is better for the child to bring it himself
Some netizens laughed at themselves: I have been deceived twice on 58.com, and I won't use this APP
Some netizens said: The confinement baby incident has happened many times, why don't you have a long memory, and in the end, the child suffered in vain.
Some netizens questioned the platform: whose interests is the platform protecting? Such a perfunctory attitude will only make everyone lose trust in the platform
Write at the end
The confinement lady who spends a lot of money is not as reliable as her own family, what kind of "professional service" is this? The platform's "no liability statement" is even more scoffing.
So, can the confinement lady who paid a high price really take care of the children for you? What do you think about this?
Author's statement: The content of the article comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, contact must be deleted.