Saving people is a good thing no matter what, it is a thing full of a sense of justice, and the person who saves people must be a good person in everyone's understanding, because only good people will ignore themselves and save others.
However, this rescuer this time told him that he was "so wronged" after he saved people, what did he experience? The netizen even searched the Internet for witnesses of the night in an attempt to prove himself.
(The pictures in this article are all from the Internet)
There are many doubts about this matter. But there is one thing that must be confirmed, and that is whether the rescuer saved the person or not, and if this fact exists, then the rescuer should be grateful, and I don't think anyone will deny this view.
From the point of view of the rescuer's own description, he did save people, and pulled several people up through actions such as "tugging, pulling, pulling, and hugging". And a netizen on the Internet who claimed to be rescued that night also posted the news.
The rescued person broke the news that he didn't know if the passers-by were helping. In fact, it is reasonable to understand this, after all, a person may not be aware of the situation around him at a critical moment, and we should understand the other party.
When this netizen stated his experience, he also said that this point is actually very crucial, because it involves whether the rescuer will choose to help because of this.
The rescued person said that his two friends "called for help while pulling", and at that time "it was very dark" and "the waves were very big", these descriptions were mentioned by this netizen, so let's imagine that if you are the rescuer, will you take the initiative to help when you see such a situation?
We can have our own choices, just as the rescuers of the time made their own choices. But the rescued person was dissatisfied because of the video posted by the other party.
If from the perspective of the rescuer, because he has done a good deed, it is understandable to want to record it, and at this time, if the other party speaks well and asks him to delete the video, maybe he will agree. And as the rescuer himself emphasized, the other party's attitude was not friendly enough, so he was not willing to do what the other person described.
A rescuer, but he has to rely on himself to find witnesses at the time on the Internet to prove himself. Do good people still have to rely on themselves to find a way to prove that they have done good deeds?
No matter how many doubts there are about this incident, no matter why several people appeared on the beach at that time, no matter whether the rescuer was saving one or two of them in the first place, or whether all four people were rescued.
If there is no ambiguity about the point of saving people, then no matter how many people the rescuer finally saved, whether the way to save people is to do everything in their power or only to pull people ashore in a light way, it should be recognized!
Let the rescuer feel so wronged after saving people, this is what we should be wary of, because no one will predict which one will come first tomorrow or the accident, although the rescuer may not change his enthusiasm because of such a thing, but what about more ordinary people?
We cannot allow those who save lives to take the risk of doing good deeds at the same time, and good deeds should be rewarded rather than sanctioned. Saving one person and saving four people are both saves, emphasizing that quantity has no meaning in the heart of the rescuer, because if it weren't for kindness, why would he have to do more?