Recently, some netizens who claim to be popular science writers, without any authoritative background, have explained themselves on the US manned moon landing, firmly stating that the US moon landing is real, and using the name of "Association for Science and Technology" to increase the influence of their remarks. This has sparked widespread concern and discussion. In fact, there are inevitably doubts about any historical event.
However, the key is how to deal with these doubts, which reflects the degree of civilization and openness of a country. There are all kinds of contradictions in the US manned moon landing so far, and it is normal to question the authenticity of the US moon landing. However, it is difficult to convince everyone with individual words alone. And forcibly suppressing questioning voices can also be counterproductive. So, what are we to make of this event?
In the face of major historical doubts, the power of individual speech is limited. It is difficult for any individual to represent authority, and it is difficult for him or her to dispel all doubts on his own. Major doubts need to be systematically studied by authoritative institutions in order to draw scientific conclusions. Individuals can put forward their own opinions, but they should not pretend to be authorities.
Collective intelligence is often more convincing than individuals. To determine the authenticity of the lunar landing, a joint team can be formed by scientific research institutions of various countries to carry out inspections using various advanced equipment, analyze lunar samples, and verify historical data. Experts from different countries were invited to discuss and exchange ideas, and the opinions of all parties were fully listened to. The result is a joint report that embodies collective wisdom.
Doubts about history should not be dispelled overnight. Decades have passed since the U.S. moon landing, and evidence may be destroyed or people may be killed. There is no immediate answer. We should remain open and inclusive, accumulate evidence, and strive to reach consensus. Even if it's not 100% sure in the end, it doesn't have to be black and white. It can be left in human memory as an unsolved historical puzzle.
Questioning and rebuttal need to be law-abiding. It is possible to rationally raise all kinds of questions and pursue the truth of the facts. But no defamation or personal attacks. Opposition to questioning also needs to be rational, and dissenting opinions should not be suppressed. Follow the spirit of scientific obsession, not ideological bigotry.
China has announced a manned landing on the moon in 2025, when it will be able to conduct a comprehensive inspection of the lunar surface and restore the historical facts of the lunar landing. Until then, we can neither blindly believe in a conclusion nor arbitrarily dismiss any possibility. Instead, we should maintain a positive and prudent attitude, promote lunar exploration with collective wisdom, and write a new chapter in the human space dream.
The debate over the authenticity of the American moon landing has never stopped. However, it is worth noting that the US authorities have not responded positively to various doubts so far, and this silence has also raised more doubts. In the face of facts, negative avoidance is unconvincing.
So why doesn't the U.S. actively respond to all kinds of doubts? One possible explanation is that space technology in the 1960s was indeed difficult to reproduce 100 per cent of the entire lunar landing. It's like we can't perfectly recreate a wedding with an old camera from the past. Another explanation is that space exploration involves commercial and military value, and the technology has been kept so far too secret to be shown to the public.
But in any case, in today's highly transparent information, it is difficult to convince the public after all. If the United States can take the initiative to disclose more internal information, or even return to the moon for open exploration, it will help dispel many doubts. This will not only benefit the United States, but will also push all mankind into a new stage of space exploration.
Of course, this requires all countries to work together to share the common wealth of mankind, the moon, on the basis of equality and openness. China has made it clear that it is willing to cooperate with other countries in the peaceful use of the moon. We are confident that we will work together for mutual benefit and win-win results. The moon should not become a new point of geopolitical disputes, but a community with a shared future for mankind.
When mankind lands on the moon again, it is necessary not only to leave behind the national flags of all countries, but also to set up a symbol of peaceful use by all mankind. Let us fill the gaps in history and look forward to the glory of the future in the spirit of friendship and cooperation, with the enthusiasm of scientific exploration, and with the attitude of great unity of mankind. In the near future, when the oriental dragon and phoenix flag flutters quietly on the moon, mankind will surely usher in the dawn of a new era in space.
Warm reminder, this article is the first work of the original headlines, it is forbidden to carry it to other platforms within 72 hours, and the rights protection function of the whole network has been opened, and the plagiarism porter has complained and reported on the whole network, thank you for your understanding