Caught in controversy - there are many suspicious incidents
Under the glamorous spotlight of many stars, there are always some seemingly deduced scripts that are reflected in real life. Recently, Taiwanese artists Big S and Fan Xiaoxuan were caught in a storm involving urine and hair testing, what is the truth of the matter? It all started with this controversy.
According to Taiwanese media reports, the hair and urine samples of the much-talked-about artists Big S and Fan Xiaoxuan were released, and tranquilizers were detected, but this is not a shocking end, because these drug ingredients are consistent with their outpatient prescription drugs, so they do not form a specific criminal substance. This news once aroused widespread concern and heated discussions in society.
There is a strong suspicion - netizens questioned
The audience cares not only about the "result", but also about the details behind it. After the news was announced, many netizens questioned this, focusing on two main issues: the collection of tranquilizer ingredients and the selection of urine and hair specimens.
First, although the medical report pointed out that the tranquilizer components detected in the urine and hair of these celebrities matched the ingredients of their outpatient prescription drugs, this situation has caused the public to wonder: why do the urine or hair of these celebrities contain prescription drugs? Is this a surprise, or is it some hidden secret?
第二，另外一位艺人具俊晔的检查却是尿液检查阴性，这和其他人进行的毛发检查形成鲜明对比。
The difference between such testing methods has also caused netizens to ask: Why is Gu Junye's testing method different from others? Is there a particular reason behind this? On this issue, the relevant explanations, including the report, are vague, leaving room for the public to think and ask questions that are difficult to ignore.
Public Opinion Stirring – Public Reflection
In this deviation from the expected result and the heated discussion of all parties about the truth of the matter, the incident between Big S and Fan Xiaoxuan has become a sensitive focus. Various questions and reflections have stirred up on the Internet, triggering the public's thinking on the norms of behavior of artists, drug use habits and regulatory mechanisms.
On the one hand, many netizens revealed their concern and worry about the artist, they expressed concern about the excessive use of tranquilizers by the artist, and some netizens even asked: Is this the high-pressure work in the entertainment industry, and the high pressure of life causes the artist to choose to use this kind of drug to relieve stress? If so, shouldn't more attention be paid to and protected the mental health of artists?
On the other hand, many people have questioned the impartiality and reliability of drug testing, and some netizens have asked what the truth lies under the shroud in the incident, wondering whether even though they are public figures who are not allegedly suspected of committing crimes, does this mean that their actions must be beyond reproach.
In addition, the discussion of the regulatory mechanism has also aroused enthusiastic response in this incident. Some netizens questioned the privileges of artists, and the question they were concerned about was: Do public figures have the possibility of some kind of "fraud" because of their special status? Whether the pattern is fair and whether the regulation is in place is quietly growing in the minds of the public.
The search for the truth, the discussion of the norms of behavior of public figures, and the reflection on social rules and justice, all these issues have been deeply excavated and widely discussed in this incident, allowing people to have a deeper understanding of this seemingly simple news event.
The turmoil is not over, and the thinking is still there
Although the drug test results of the Big S and Fan Xiaoxuan incidents have been announced, the cloud of doubts still hangs over the public's mind. This is not only a drug test storm about artists, but also a deep reflection on the monitoring of public figures' behavior, the transparency of drug use, and social justice.
In conclusion, this turmoil did not end because of the announcement of the results, but triggered more discussion and thinking. On the one hand, how to understand the behavioral norms of public figures, how to look at the life pressure and mental health problems in the entertainment industry, and how to think about the fairness and effectiveness of the regulatory mechanism, the public needs further in-depth thinking.
This matter is still unsettled, the truth still needs to be explored, but the thinking and reflection of society has never stopped. In the future, perhaps we need more practical actions to have deep control over the behavior norms of public figures, and at the same time pay attention to their mental health and life stress, only in this way can we make our society more just and more harmonious.