Producer: Chuantuo Think Tank (No. 5151 Exclusive Debut)
Questioning the Apollo moon landing is a hot topic in recent times, and there is a very interesting conclusion here, I don't know if you can see it, listen to me.
The Apollo moon landings took place from 1969 to 1972, a total of 7 times, when the United States and the Soviet Union were in the Cold War, and when was the Cuban Missile Crisis, it was in 1962. At that time, the United States and the Soviet Union mobilized their national forces to confront each other in the field of ballistic missiles and launch vehicles, and from Moscow to Baikonur, the Soviet Union organized tens of thousands of technicians and the entire industrial system to fight against the United States.
So when Nixon announced the success of the Apollo 11 moon landing, who do you think is the most skeptical? Who should be more questionable? Of course, the Soviet top brass could have listened to Nixon's side of the story?
They will inevitably use all kinds of intelligence, reconnaissance, surveillance, and so on to verify the authenticity of the Apollo moon landing, with the aim of seizing the handle of the Americans' falsification of the moon landing and verifying whether the Americans have really landed on the moon.
There is a source for this statement, when the Soviet chief aerospace engineer Vasily Mishin, who succeeded Korolev, later said that the Soviet Union carried out a comprehensive surveillance of the Apollo mission to the moon. There was even the launch of the Luna 15 probe, which orbited very close to Apollo 11.
Picture interpretation: Soviet lunar sample return scheme
In fact, the Soviet Union has long used all forces at the national level to verify it, including the Soviet Aerospace Forces, radio telescopes and other technical means, as well as the all-pervasive KGB intelligence means.
There is also an even more important point, the Apollo moon landing was more than once, July 1969 was the first, and there were 6 more followers, including an oxygen tank that exploded and almost hung up, so for the USSR and other countries, there were 6 more opportunities to verify whether the Americans were fake. Counting Apollo 11, a total of 7 times, can't you catch one of those 7 times?
Let's reason further down and question the Apollo moon landing, does that mean, and at the same time, question the Soviet space reconnaissance capabilities and the KGB's intelligence capabilities, and even question how the Soviets could not be caught once after being deceived by the Americans 7 times?
So, this is an interesting conclusion that questions the Apollo moon landing at the moment, and what the Soviet top leadership could not catch with strategic resources at the national level has already been caught by some people. The KGB, which was omnipenetrate, was also slapped in the face, and was deceived by the Americans 7 times and could not be caught once. At this point, I have not drawn conclusions about whether the Apollo moon landing was true or false, I am just telling you logically that there is such an interesting conclusion when questioning the Apollo moon landing.
Picture interpretation: Images of the moon landing released by the Americans
Now, from a military point of view, I will talk about what I think of the Apollo moon landing. At least since Chang'e-2, it has actually had the ability to make imaging observations of its landing site, and the technical specifications of the CCD camera carried on Chang'e-2 are comparable to those carried by NASA's lunar reconnaissance orbiter, which has a resolution of about 0.5 meters to 1 meter. Produced by Chuantuo Think Tank, the headline is exclusive, and reprinting is prohibited. The official website of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has announced the landing sites of Chang'e-3 and Chang'e-4, which is the case in the picture, and also released the locations of Apollo's six moon landings, as shown in the map.
Therefore, the CCD camera of Chang'e-2 should also be able to see the landing site, and there are more than ten kilometers of lunar rover traces on it, which are important references.
Image interpretation: Chang'e-3 and No. 4 landing sites released by LRO
Picture interpretation: The Apollo landing site released by the LRO
Then the question becomes, why do we have to prove that the Apollo moon landing was real? Isn't that the same as proving that our strategic opponents have been good in the past, so I don't think it's a pointless thing.
On April 8 last month, the U.S. military deployed intermediate-range missiles to the Philippines, strategically directly targeting a large area of economically developed cities along our southeast coast and bringing them within the scope of military strikes. Against this backdrop, it doesn't seem appropriate for us to prove that Americans were excellent in the past. Of course, the central figure of the Apollo moon landing was von Braun, a German rocket expert, and without him, I think the Apollo moon landing would have been worse.
Picture interpretation: The U.S.-Soviet race to the moon can be said to be a showdown between the Germans von Braun and Korolev to a certain extent
Therefore, my view on the Apollo moon landing is that whether it is true or false, let it pass, the current United States also plans to return to the moon before 2030, make a comeback, a new round of space confrontation, comprehensive technical confrontation is also in progress, there are not many years left from 2030, you can count on your fingers, so we don't need to care whether the Apollo moon landing is real or false, and strive to achieve a manned landing of Chinese on the moon by 2030, is what we need to do now. When I encounter a node event, I will report to you in time and do an analysis. #文章首发挑战赛#