The whole network has been opened to protect rights and carry plagiarism reports
Art comes from life, but it is higher than life. While pursuing the highest level of art, artists often need to break the convention, try boldly, and even break through the bottom line and taboos.
This not only tests the artist's courage and determination, but also requires superb control ability to balance artistic pursuit and realistic bottom line.
In 2007, during the filming of the art film "Lust and Caution" directed by world-class director Ang Lee, a jaw-dropping incident occurred - the actors did "real" when filming intimate scenes in order to be "real"!
This not only brought great impact and distress to the scene, but also set off a "wave of subversion" in the art world.
Some see this as a blasphemy against the artist's professionalism, while others praise his dedication to "authenticity". Either way, this event became an extraordinary story in the history of art.
According to many sources, the "real" incidents at the filming site of "Lust and Caution" mainly occurred in some explicit intimate scenes. According to the crew's arrangement, these scenes were originally to be filmed "in a cover-up", but some actors actually did it during the filming.
The situation at that time was said to be like this: the guidance team found that the actors' movements had exceeded the safe range, and hurriedly shouted to stop, but some of the actors "went too deep into the play" and simply ignored it.
In the end, the actors not only did not stop the "real" behavior, but "did" hard, causing the scene to get out of control for a while.
This unexpected event brought a huge shock to the crew. Some staff members said afterwards that the atmosphere at that time was indeed very weird, as if an "absurd" scene was repeated.
Some people even commented that although it does go against professional ethics on the surface, it also reflects the artist's persistent pursuit of "authenticity".
The "real" incident of "Lust and Caution" sparked a "war of words" in the art world. Some denounced it as a blasphemy against art and professional ethics and an act of "crossing the line".
Others believe that art should have the courage to break the mold and face up to the dark side of human nature, and that the so-called "crossing the line" is nothing more than a narrow value.
For example, a film critic commented, "Artistic creation should break through all taboos and challenge people's moral bottom line, otherwise art will lose its meaning of existence." "
However, there are also voices that believe that "art privileges cannot be used to rationalize all out-of-control behaviors, and art still has basic professional ethics and moral bottom lines." "
It is worth noting that some people even compare the events of "Lust and Caution" with the classic art film "Longing for Life", which was banned in 1972, believing that the former is "quite restrained", while the latter is "completely free of oneself".
Undoubtedly, this argument has also attracted the condemnation of many opponents.
However, we must admit that the "real" incident of "Lust and Caution" has indeed brought an unprecedented opportunity for artistic creation to think.
How do artists strike a balance between the desire for "authenticity" and respect for ethics? Should art be reckless in its pursuit of "purity", or should it retain a basic bottom line? It is not only about the intrinsic value of art, but also about the professional ethics and social responsibility of artists.
In the 21st century, artistic creation is facing unprecedented opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, new technological means and forms of expression are constantly emerging, which bring a steady stream of impetus to artistic innovation.
On the other hand, the openness and pluralism of social concepts also leave more space for artistic creation.