On May 15, Beijing time, FMVP, or Most Valuable Player of the Finals, has long been regarded as one of the crowning honors in basketball. This award recognizes the best player in the playoffs and is a comprehensive recognition of a player's leadership, scoring ability, defensive ability and other aspects in the game. However, in recent years, the controversy over FMVP has been heating up, and one of the most controversial topics is: Does Iguodala, a player who averages just 16 points per game, deserve this honor?
Iguodala did receive the FMVP honor in his career, but the achievement of this honor has raised a lot of questions. Many believe that players who average just 16 points per game are clearly not comparable to those who average 30 points or more per game in basketball, a sport where scoring is the main goal. Therefore, Iguodala's honor of being awarded the FMVP seems to have greatly diminished the gold content of this award.
However, should we really judge a player's value in the Finals based solely on points per game? In fact, the game of basketball is far from being as simple as scoring. A player's leadership, defensive ability, ability to string teams in the game, etc., are equally important. Iguodala doesn't average a lot of points per game, but he does much more than that.
First of all, Iguodala's leadership in the game has been nothing short of spectacular. He always stepped up when it mattered and led the team out of trouble. His experience and intelligence have made his teammates trust him and willing to hand over the ball to him. In key moments, Iguodala always makes the right decisions to help his team win.
Secondly, Iguodala has been equally good on the defensive end. He has excellent physical attributes and a keen sense of basketball, and is able to effectively limit the opponent's scoring. In the finals, he successfully defended the opponent's scoring core many times and contributed to the team's victory.
In addition, Iguodala has also done a pretty good job of stringing teams. He is able to connect the team's attack and defense very well, allowing the team to move more fluidly in the game. His passing and playmaking skills have allowed his team's attacking skills to be more diverse and his team-mates to play to their strengths.
So, despite Iguodala's modest points per game, his all-round performance in the game was enough for him to earn the honor of FMVP. The accolade is not based solely on scoring stats, but on his ability to lead the game, defend and connect with the team.
Of course, we cannot deny that there is indeed a certain degree of subjectivity and controversy in the selection of FMVP. Different judges and fans may have different opinions and evaluation criteria. But that's the beauty of the game of basketball, which allows us to appreciate and evaluate the performance of our players from different angles and levels.
Overall, Iguodala's honor for the FMVP is not unhonorable, but it exemplifies the diversity and comprehensiveness of the basketball game. We can't judge a player's value based on scoring stats alone, but we should look at their performance in the game more holistically. At the same time, we should also respect the results of the judges and acknowledge their efforts and wisdom in the selection process.
In the future, we look forward to seeing more outstanding players show their talent and strength in the finals and compete for this supreme glory." And no matter who can win the honor of FMVP in the end, we should give them full respect and recognition, because they are all outstanding representatives and inheritors of the sport of basketball.