Recently, there was news about the night battle system of the Three Kingdoms Strategic Edition. The update will start again, and this time the update will focus on three aspects: morale at night, alliance building protection, and team siege value.
Now four general directions are given.
The first is the extended late-night mode.
Second, forcibly demoralize.
Thirdly, when the siege force is insufficient, the siege value becomes 1.
Fourth, all allied buildings have additional shield values in late night mode.
There is a high probability that this news is true, and if the three wars are really changed like this, the night battle or the night game experience will basically become zero. Forcing everyone to rest at night.
Whether this is a good thing or not, I personally think that it really deserves to be promoted, and SLG games should not be an obstacle to affect the player's life or even rest.
But now there is a problem, and one that is very representative:
This is also a major factor in the disapproval of the Night Combat changes in the Carrier Zone.
It's not that hard to solve this problem, because it's actually a problem for the alliance itself, not a problem for the game. Since players abroad want to play this game, it is impossible for most players in China to adapt to a small number of foreign players.
As we all know, there is no such thing as a late-night mode in the wilderness stage, in fact, the most important experience of the game is here. Clearing the wasteland is the highlight of the entire World War III experience.
This part is not limited now, and the later alliance battles are not a big deal for foreign players in the alliance who do have foreign players in the alliance, and the allies can help host it themselves.
Another question is whether there should be night battles in the game.
Players suggest if they can set up an alliance, say once a month or once a week.
In order for this strategy to be effective, at least two conditions must be met:
First, it can only be applied to Stratagem Alliance players.
That is, to launch a night battle strategy, but this alliance has its own bonus, and the opponent does not. Otherwise, it is a kind of transgender force, and if it is effective on both sides, the alliance leader or commander is estimated to be sleepless at night.
That is, the opponent at this time, there is no point at all in participating in the battle. I can only wake up the next day to assess how much damage the other party's night battle has brought and whether it will affect the whole situation.
Second, it can only be effective for a specific scope. Limit the number of people fighting at night or limit the scope of the implementation of the strategy, such as a group or a county, and the plan beyond the scope will not take effect.
If this condition is not satisfied, then the addition of the Night War strategy is useless, and the idea that World War III is almost equivalent to giving up the time period of 1-6 is completely conflicting.
There is a positive side to the three wars, that is, he has been adjusting his operation direction with the strategy of his competitors, as long as the opponent has it, we must have it, and if the opponent does not have it, we must try to have it. This is probably one of the main reasons why the current three wars can maintain their core competitiveness.
But I want to say when the Tactics Reshaping Coupon will be released, as long as you release this, you can completely kill any opponent now. I demolished Cao Cao, but killing ministers in this dream is useless, don't you plan it?