Since a series of social events occurred in Hong Kong in 2019, the British government announced the so-called new BNO visa policy, claiming that it is based on the so-called "responsibility" to Hong Kong, trying to provide "protection" for some of the Hong Kong people involved through this policy, in fact, it is a crude interference in China's Hong Kong affairs and China's internal affairs, but many Hong Kong people believe in evil and immigrate to the UK, and as a result, most of them have encountered difficulties and discrimination in all aspects in the UK. Not only is the quality of life and working conditions far worse than those in Hong Kong, but even some Hong Kong people have encountered difficulties in maintaining their basic livelihoods. As a result, some Hong Kong people who "listened to persuasion" chose to quietly return to Hong Kong, but the vast majority of them still chose to die for the sake of "face". After several years of "social beatings" in this foreign country, especially the British government directly turned around and launched a "spicy move" to crack down on immigrants, which made the situation of Hong Kong people in Britain even worse, so some Hong Kong people in Britain gradually couldn't stand it anymore and couldn't pretend anymore, so they directly started the "strike" mode, and as a result, they were collectively expelled in seconds, which is really not too miserable.
Hong Kong immigrants who want to reach the pinnacle of life in the UK have been reduced to "fourth-class citizens" who are not anyone, and many Hong Kong immigrants choose to work part-time jobs in order to earn a living, but even part-time jobs will be discriminated against.
Recently, some Hong Kong people who moved to Britain decided to join forces to strike in order to resist the "unfair treatment of work", and they planned to continue to carry forward the same set on the streets of Hong Kong in the United Kingdom, saying that they would "fight the British to the end".
A total of 17 Hong Kong immigrants were laid off from the layoffs, who had joined the British factory through employment agencies last year to work on a temporary basis. Luckier than them, some of the "siblings" were hired as "long-term workers", but whether they were gig or long-term workers, they were not treated fairly by the factory, not only faced unfair workload and salary distribution, but also often encountered workplace bullying and personality insults, and simply did not treat them as human beings.
As a result, some Hong Kong immigrants who worked for "long-term work" took the lead in launching a "joint strike" campaign, and they put forward five demands for improvement, namely:
First, the British have an unfriendly attitude and are prone to scolding, which must be improved.
Second, the distribution of work is unfair, and the hard work is done by Hong Kong immigrants, which must be improved.
Third, the working environment is poor and the rest time is insufficient, which must be improved.
Fourth, the working environment is poor and the rest time is insufficient, which must be improved.
Fifth, salaries are not paid in full, there is no opportunity for salary increases, and they must be improved.
The Hong Kong immigrants who participated in the "joint strike" were led by the "long-term workers", who said they would refuse to work if their demands were not satisfactorily answered. As a result, the iron fist of the British management came quickly, and 17 of the "gig workers" were directly announced to be dismissed. Seeing that the "joint strike" could not fool the British, the "long-term workers" who took the lead hurriedly changed their faces to protect their jobs and directly betrayed their "siblings", asking these dismissed people to "go away quietly" on behalf of the factory.
One of the dismissed Hong Kong immigrants said that the "joint strike" was a request from both long-term workers and casual workers, and that the former could continue to work in the factory that night without incident, while the 17 gig workers "were all asked to leave by the company". They also accused the company of not paying them a salary commensurate with their working hours, "only 2-3 hours for 6 hours".
The dismissed Hong Kong immigrants angrily reprimanded the long-term workers: You have ruined the jobs of more than a dozen brothers, and you can't stand them! These betrayed Hong Kong immigrants still wanted to go to the British media such as B BC to cry and make some moves in the field of public opinion, but as a result, these British media, who had helped the Hong Kong destabilizing elements to hype up a lot, began to pretend to be deaf and dumb at this time.
These British media can praise these rioters as "youth idols" during the Hong Kong riots, and constantly encourage violent behavior, cheering and cheering for the rioters in a weird way. But right now, it is the same group of "Hong Kong Tseng" Xiao Tiantian, who was completely regarded as a "little transparent" when she was bullied in the UK, not only did she no longer want to deal with them, but she also said in a downright manner, what are you doing with the media when you are collectively fired? Go to a lawyer! It means that Britain is a society governed by the rule of law, and the media will not support these outsiders to disrupt the order.
Seeing that there was no way to find the British media, these dismissed immigrants had no choice but to obediently go to a lawyer, and as a result, they were also taught by a British lawyer, who told them that this kind of behavior could not be regarded as a strike, and this was called absenteeism. In desperation, they finally had to cry on the media, saying that they didn't dare to stick to the previous demands, and just wanted to get reemployment opportunities. also because they were afraid of being recognized, so they were included in the blacklist of changing jobs in the UK, and they also wore masks in the video. How arrogant the streets of Hong Kong used to be, but now it is really humble.
It is truly "the wretched must have something to hate"! A few years ago, these people blocked roads, buses, and subways, forcibly preventing Hong Kong citizens from going to work. When the citizens said that they wanted to go to the door to "get food", the ladies gathered around and asked the citizens, "Hong Kong people love to work so much?" Are human rights and freedoms important, or are food and drink important? Netizens said: And what happened to them in the UK now, isn't this the current world newspaper?
The number of Hong Kong people who have moved to the UK through BNO is not a small number, and if it is twisted into a rope, this power is not small, why do you only look aggrieved when something happens now? Where did all the arrogance in Hong Kong go at that time? Just imagine, if such a dismissal happened in Hong Kong, these Hong Kong people who moved to Britain would not have to make a fuss? But in England, they became extremely humble. In the face of being bullied and insulted in the workplace, not only did they not dare to hold demonstrations, but they finally prepared to go on strike, but they were directly fired from the factory, and even half of their wages were given, and they could only knock out their teeth and swallow them in the end.