Loading...
Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
On the chessboard of international politics, Britain's actions are becoming more and more reckless and out of line.
Its stance not only crosses the traditional borders of the United States, but also frequently speaks out on the Ukraine issue, showing an unprecedented directness and boldness.
For the first time ever, British special forces are on the front lines of the battlefield in Ukraine, and the key choices of the British government have had a decisive impact on the political direction of Ukraine at a critical juncture.
Take March 2022 as an example, just as the dust was about to settle on the peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, the British Prime Minister's urgent visit to Kyiv caused the peace talks to go down the drain.
Not only that, but the UK's military support for Ukraine is rock-solid, and when the former prime minister visited Kyiv, he even made a lot of nonsense, claiming that Ukraine has ample rights to use the weapons provided by the UK to strike targets in Russia.
As soon as this statement came out, it was immediately seen as a clear signal of the West's attempt to exacerbate the conflict.
This unbridled support naturally provoked a strong backlash from Russia.
The Russian Foreign Ministry quickly issued a solemn warning that if Ukraine dares to use British weapons to invade Russian territory, Russia will definitely carry out retaliatory strikes against any British military target around the world.
Subsequently, the Russian side intensified its combat readiness drills for tactical nuclear weapons, demonstrating its serious attitude and full preparation for the escalation of the crisis.
Britain's actions have undoubtedly pushed itself to the forefront of international disputes, so that Britain can no longer manipulate the situation behind the scenes, but must face unprecedented military challenges.
Soon after, tensions in Anglo-Russian relations added fuel to the fire.
The fact that Britain unilaterally announced the expulsion of a Russian military attache and brazenly began to examine Russia's diplomatic assets in Britain after the British unfounded accusation that he was suspected of being involved in the fire accident undoubtedly indicates that relations between the two sides will deteriorate further.
In this regard, the spokesman of the Russian Foreign Ministry expressed strong dissatisfaction and vowed that it would take-for-tat measures in response to the British provocation.
This series of events further exposed Britain's growing willingness to adopt a more direct and aggressive military and foreign policy on the international stage.
Britain's relationship with Russia, in particular, has fallen into a new situation of high tension and challenge.
As time went on, it became clearer that Britain's desperate strategy and its serious consequences were gradually emerging.
Although the United States clearly expressed its dissatisfaction with the Kyiv regime through the "Foreign Affairs Magazine" on October X, and frankly expressed its opposition to Ukraine's ambition to regain lost territory, this is obviously a paving for the United States to reduce its own pressure in the Middle East and gradually withdraw from the Ukrainian issue.
This shift in attitude, coupled with the reticence of European countries on Putin's launch of tactical nuclear weapons drills, bodes well for deep divisions within the West over how to deal with Ukraine.
In this complex international situation, Ukraine clearly favors cost-effective drones from China, trying to reduce its dependence on the West in order to increase the autonomy of its policy.
This shift in strategy shows that Ukraine is seeking more options to maintain its strategic flexibility in a changing international environment.
Britain itself, on the other hand, seems to be under pressure from both inside and outside.
The turmoil in domestic politics has exacerbated tensions in its international relations.
In this dilemma, the British government has taken a more radical international stance, trying to divert the focus of domestic politics through a tough international image.
However, this strategy has instead made its position in Europe more isolated.
Britain's relations with the EU have become increasingly tense since Brexit, and its diplomatic strategy is clearly aimed at blocking the proximity between Russia and Europe in order to maintain its competitiveness in the financial and energy sectors.
These adventures by the UK are trying to redefine its role and influence on the international stage.
However, it remains to be seen how sustained and effective this strategy will be.
Britain's actions are undoubtedly digging its own grave in a complex game of chess.
Not only did this excesses expose its internal vulnerability and external isolation, but Russia's resolute response and Putin's tactical nuclear weapons drills are a powerful response to Britain's rashness.
Britain's hubris and unjustified provocations will only lead to further isolation and deeper predicament in the international community.