Recently, doubts about the authenticity of the U.S. Apollo moon landing program have heated up again around the world. Since the late 60s and early 70s of the last century, the United States successfully carried out the Apollo series of lunar missions, becoming the first country to land on the moon in human history. However, as time went on, some doubts emerged, and there were doubts about the authenticity of the moon landing that year.
Loading...
These doubts are not unfounded. Judging from the photos and videos of the moon landing, many scholars believe that the photos and videos taken during the moon landing mission have suspicious points, such as background light, object shadows, etc., which do not conform to the characteristics of the lunar environment. Later, some people in related professions pointed out that there were anomalies in the technical data, equipment and astronaut behavior used in the lunar landing mission, and these doubts raised doubts about the authenticity of the lunar landing.
In response to these questions, NASA has also responded recently. The space agency said the Apollo moon landing program was real and an important milestone in human exploration of the universe. At the same time, the space agency has always emphasized that the lunar mission of that year has undergone rigorous scientific verification and review, and all data and materials are authentic and reliable. It even directly claimed that their moon landing technology had been destroyed. The US space agency did not give a direct response to questions about the authenticity of the moon landing.
Clearly, the space agency's response did not completely quell the skepticism. Many people think this claim is unconvincing, and hope that the space agency will provide more evidence to prove the authenticity of the moon landing. At the same time, there has been speculation about NASA's claim that it has destroyed the technical data for the moon landing, which could further intensify the controversy over the authenticity of the moon landing.
At the same time, in its response, NASA also mentioned the changes that have taken place in the way the U.S. space industry operates in recent years. With the rise of private enterprise and the continuous advancement of technology, the U.S. space industry has gradually shifted from the government-led model of the past to a new model of public-private partnership, NASA said. They also hope to promote the continued development of space exploration through cooperation with the private sector.
The response to NASA has been mixed across the globe. And this response has also aroused the attention and heated discussion of our Chinese people.
Some netizens analyzed that it can be seen from the photos that when the US space moon landed on the moon, it left deep footprints on the moon, so why did not find the tire tracks left by the lunar landing vehicle. For the Chinese lunar landing rover, which is smaller than the American lunar landing rover, it did leave deep tire tracks. The analysis of netizens is not unreasonable, and it also deepens people's understanding of the authenticity of the US moon landing.
Some netizens think that even the fire detection vehicle of the American Curiosity is fake. Because if we hadn't had the ability to land on Mars in the early years, we wouldn't have been able to carry people to the moon now. The opinions put forward by this netizen also make people think deeply, as a country with such advanced technology, it has not been manned to the moon until now, which is really unbelievable.
However, some netizens also agreed with NASA's statement. Netizens believe that the incident of landing on the moon has been confirmed by academicians on the mainland. There is also a reason for the statement that the space agency is a private enterprise, because of the institutional relationship of the United States, as a private enterprise space agency, they have a reason to delete this original technology. And for the United States, even if it lands on the moon again, it does not need to use the original technology, and it can be re-innovated.
There is some truth in the opinions of netizens, and we have yet to confirm the authenticity of the US landing on the moon. We also hope that China's science and technology will continue to progress and that China's aerospace industry will continue to develop.
In the future, the controversy over the authenticity of the Apollo moon landings is likely to continue. As technology continues to advance and new space exploration missions are implemented, we are expected to unravel more mysteries about the Moon and space exploration. At the same time, we should also maintain an open and rational attitude, deal with various views and disputes, and jointly promote the development of human space exploration.