In this world, tragedy often comes from a small accident, but it involves a series of mysteries and controversies. This was the case in a recent murder case in Huining County, Gansu Province, where a 39-year-old village woman director died while drunk.
It is understood that on the evening of April 25 last year, a village in Pingtouchuan Town, Huining County, held a welcome reception to welcome the new leader, and invited cadres from neighboring villages to come to congratulate them. Cheng, who is the local women's director, was also in attendance.
In this kind of rural wine bureau, it is the norm for everyone to drink excessively. Indeed, it turned out that Cheng also drank a lot of wine that night. In the early morning of the next day, after the wine party, Cheng took the car of Zhu, an accountant in the same village, to go home.
But halfway through, she suddenly asked to get off the bus at a roadside rental house, because she had rented it to help her two sons borrow money temporarily. However, Zhu did not listen and continued to drive forward, and Cheng shouted to stop, but Zhu ignored it.
Just when the two sides were at a stalemate, Cheng actually hit the car door head-on, stepped out with one leg, and then unfortunately fell to the ground and was dragged by the vehicle and was seriously injured. By the time Zhu realized and sent her to the hospital, Cheng was already dying, and finally passed away after rescue efforts.
After Cheng's death, the police quickly intervened in the investigation, and Zhu was also detained. At the same time, the family's revelations also made the cause and details of the murder confusing and suspicious.
First, people question how the family knew about the incident. According to the current public information, there should be no other parties except Zhu, so the details in Cheng's family are likely to come from Zhu's words.
Therefore, the truth of the incident is in doubt. Second, someone broke the news that Zhu had long thought about Cheng, and he had drunk her with intent and wanted to take her elsewhere. Some people also said that the purpose of this meeting was to pull Cheng into the water.
From this point of view, Cheng's practice of getting out of the car has become instinctive self-preservation. If these rumors are true, then Zhu's behavior is a premeditated crime, and the circumstances are even more serious.
Third, netizens questioned the reasonableness of this meeting. Why did the new leader of the neighboring village hold a grand welcome meeting and invite the people of the village after he took office? It is unusual for the relationship between the two parties to be so close, and it is inevitable that people will think of whether they are taking the opportunity to eat and drink at public expense.
In this regard, the attitude of netizens is also divided into two factions: some people sympathize with Cheng's experience, thinking that she is just drunk under the pressure of the leader. But others also accuse Cheng of letting himself go, and if he could have resisted or refused to eat and drink at this public expense, the tragedy could have been avoided.
Perhaps the most controversial are some of the gossip about Cheng and the female director of his position. Some people speculate that Zhu may have been tempted by Cheng's special status as a women's director.
In this regard, netizens have questioned and criticized the position of women's director, and some people even took out the example of a pair of village cadres in Shandong last year to satirize and belittle the position of women's director. In the face of all kinds of criticism and suspicion, we can't help but reflect: why does a tragic event breed so much negative suspicion and abuse?
In fact, the root cause of people's prejudice and discrimination against others, jobs, and groups is the root cause. When a tragedy occurs, people take the opportunity to vent their prejudices against certain people and groups, turning a blind eye to the truth of the incident itself.
Cheng's death is undoubtedly a tragedy, but too much radical criticism of her not only lacks factual basis, but also aggravates the pain of her family. We see that because of people's prejudice against the village cadres to eat and drink at public funds, the rationality of Cheng's participation in the meeting was denied; Her integrity was questioned by prejudice against the position of women's director.
She was accused of being immoral in drinking because of people's prejudice against rural people for alcoholism. It can be seen that blind slander and suspicion will only exacerbate social antagonism and disharmony. It is true that Cheng's death was due to an alcoholic party, and she may also have misbehaved in some ways.
But should that be a reason for us to blame and humiliate her? Although it is inappropriate for village cadres to drink alcohol, they are also ordinary laborers who contribute to rural development.
The fact that women directors are sometimes incomplete does not mean that there is a character problem in the whole group. As for drunken immorality, this may be due to the need to improve the social environment and humanistic qualities.