Loading...
On May 12, an incident that occurred in Xixigu Village, Dongguan, Guangdong Province aroused the attention and heated discussions of a large number of netizens.
But is that really the case? Is there really such an arrogant and unreasonable scenic spot management? Or is it malicious hype by photographers?
事件背景
On May 12th, when photographer Applejack was taking pictures of customers in the scenic area, three managers from Xixigu Village came up to stop Applejack from taking pictures, and violently pushed and abused.
The manager commanded the two security guards and shouted at the top of their voices: "This is from the ancient village, take these two people away for me." ”
Then the two security guards stepped forward and kept pushing the photographer Ajie to let them leave here, the two security guards were also very arrogant, and said that you can complain casually, or call the police, after the two sides argued here for a while, the photographer and his friend had to obediently leave the place, but the manager did not stop abusing: "This is my place, you are spreading wild in my place, you make so much money, why didn't you give the ancient village a point?" ”
摄影师将此视频发布到网络，媒体采访当事人
事后，摄影师阿杰将该视频发布到了自己个人社交平台上后引发了大量网友的关注，5月13日有媒体联系到了他，在面对媒体采访时阿杰表示：“不管你是拍照收费的摄影师还是个人拍照的都要收费，景区如果要拍的话，每个人收80元或者说一年18000元，报警是有人报了，但好像没有什么结果。 ”
According to the person concerned, as long as you take pictures in the scenic spot, you will be charged, whether you are an individual or a commercial photographer, you will be driven away if you do not pay the fee, why does this regulation sound so awkward? I've never heard of a scenic spot like this, is it different to say that Xixi Scenic Area is different? Didn't call the police but didn't call the police? The more you say it, the more outrageous it becomes.
不是谁拍视频谁有理
笔者看了两遍原视频终于发现了一些端倪，在管理人员前来告知不让拍照的时候，摄影师率先大声质问道：“这条路是不是你们的？ ”
The manager's attitude was okay at first, and then he was angry after being questioned loudly by the parties, and there was a dispute afterwards.
From this point, it is obvious that the photographer should often take pictures in the scenic area, and he knows the identity of the man in civilian clothes, otherwise if he is stopped by a strange man from taking pictures, he will at least ask the identity of the other party first.
There is also the person concerned who said that no matter what kind of photography will be expelled.
Dongguan netizens in the comment area gave the truth, let's take a look.
网友：古村本来就有明文规定，商业拍摄就是要收费的，想利用古村当背景然后你给游客拍照赚钱，又不想给古村缴费，哪有这么好的事？
网友：这里我起码去过3次了，从来没听说过拍照要收费，商业摄影要收费而已吧？
Seeing this, everyone should understand it, typical out-of-context videos and descriptions, not who shoots the video, who is reasonable, the scenic spot needs to be maintained every year, employee wages, people build well, you take a camera in and come in to set up a stall to take pictures for a fee, isn't this a typical other person's labor fruits are used by you for free?
It's no wonder that the managers would say that: "You make so much money, have you ever given a cent to the ancient village?" ”
To sum up: I support the behavior of the scenic spot management, although it is rough, but this is also reasonable, maybe we are only seeing such a thing, who can guarantee that both of them are not playing this kind of scene every day?
你觉得谁有理？