Preface
The independence of judicial power not only means that the executive power, the procuratorial power, and the fact that no individual can interfere in the trial, but also includes that the court is not allowed to interfere with the trial by insiders. Otherwise, the fairness and impartiality of the trial will inevitably be undermined, causing secondary harm to the victim and even the suspect, and seriously undermining the authority of the law.
Event details
Recently, the Intermediate People's Court of Haixi Prefecture and the People's Court of Tianjun County in Qinghai Province were accused of remote control interference in the trial of the retrial case, which attracted the attention of the whole network.
Loading...
It is reported that on May 11, the Tianjun County People's Court publicly retried the case of Suo and others picking quarrels and provoking trouble, during which the president of the Tianjun County People's Court and the presiding judge of the second instance of the case used a WeChat group to remotely direct the trial in real time, and said in the group that "there is no need to discuss with him", "interrupt", "be hard, don't speak at will", and the lawyer of the suspect in this case said that the news spread on the Internet was true.
On May 13, the Qinghai Provincial High People's Court responded that it was verifying the investigation, and that the Qinghai Provincial People's Procuratorate had intervened in the investigation, and the trial had been cancelled.
Netizen comments
Some netizens sighed: It's too shocking, too surprised, it's your own people or people around you who betray you.
Some netizens ridiculed: Dean Chen Qingquan has the right to interpret the law.
Some netizens said: Since Douyin, cognition and three views have been refreshed all the time, and I have grown knowledge and insight at the same time, but there are really a lot of negative energy things, which is terrible.
Personal opinion
At present, judges adjudicate cases under a lifelong responsibility system, which does not tolerate the slightest falsehood or error, and the trial is different from other things, and once the trial is tried, it takes legal effect, and the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of the parties are defined, and they are compulsory. We often say that justice will be late but will not be absent, and a fair and just judgment can timely remedy the losses of the injured party, punish the infringer in a timely manner, and maintain the dignity of the law and the authority of the trial in a timely manner, and at the same time can form a good social deterrent and educational effect. On the contrary, if the independence of the trial is interfered with, the outcome of the trial is often unfair or even unjust, false and wrongly decided.
In this case, the judge who remotely manipulated and intervened had a direct relationship with the case itself, including the presiding judge of the second instance of this case, and the mainland's two-instance final adjudication system, since this case was remanded for retrial after the second instance, that is, the original trial of the case was problematic, and if there was a problem, the original presiding judge was directly responsible, and it was difficult to get rid of it.
Thinking about it the other way around, blatantly interfering in the retrial, this is a mistake on top of a mistake, and it is also through WeChat, such an inferior operation exposes the lack of professionalism, and directly leaves the tail of evidence, covering his ears and stealing the bell. It can be seen from this that the judges who intervene in the case are not up to the mark in terms of character and professionalism. How can such a person hold the gavel in his hand? How can fairness, justice and the authority of the law be maintained? On the contrary, it undermines fairness and justice and undermines the authority of the law.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss!