When the neighbor turns the door of the house into his own area, piles up garbage, wheelchairs, shoe cabinets, sundries, can you agree?
Should the shared space of the community be a random place for personal belongings?
In Foshan, Guangdong, a young man got into an argument with his neighbor, an older lady.
The reason is that the lady often leaves a wheelchair and other miscellaneous items in front of her house, including a shoe cabinet, a shopping cart, and a wheelchair for patients.
Loading...
According to the man, these items not only occupy public space, but also often pile up garbage, affecting the passage and environmental hygiene of residents.
So, he called in property management to solve the problem. When the property intervenes, the conversation escalates into a heated argument.
The woman argued that there was nothing wrong with her placing items in front of her house, and asked, "We northerners are reasonable, but you southerners can't be a little more particular?" ”
She also claimed that the wheelchair could not be kept at home all the time because of the bacteria on it.
The man countered that while a wheelchair could not always be kept in the house, it could not obstruct the common area.
To this, the lady responded: "You will also have patients in your family." The phrase seemed to have a curse connotation, adding to the tension of the debate.
She insisted that her approach was reasonable, and accused the man of being unsympathetic, even offering in her agitation that she would go to the man's home to retaliate if her wheelchair was disposed of.
During the dispute, the woman repeatedly stressed that she had elderly and sick people in her house and did not have time to dispose of the garbage immediately, while the man pointed out that even if there were sick people, they could not put their garbage in the fire escape, which was related to the safety of residents.
The property eventually intervened and said that there really shouldn't be garbage piled up at the door. The lady was dissatisfied with this and asked rhetorically, "Where do you put the garbage at the door?" ”
The woman said
The woman said
During the argument, the man emphasized that he was a cultured person, in contrast to the insulting remarks of the lady.
The incident ended with the woman entering the house in anger, but what was left was a rift in the neighborhood and the problem of public space management to be resolved.
Netizen's point of view
The northerners are not like this, the dead old woman has no quality, and she smears the northerners!
I remember reporting to the fire department, the first time I saw you move into the house, the second time I came to check, and the things that were still occupied could be thrown away.
Our house next door to 60 flat lives 5 people, the door is piled up into a mountain, no way, the property fire street does not care, alas
However, those who place shoe racks, non-motorized vehicles, boxes and cabinets and other private sundries in public corridors are all immoral things that love to take advantage of small advantages, and they are extremely selfish, without exception!
We see a typical community management problem, involving multiple dimensions such as public space use, individual rights, geographical bias, and law enforcement.
As far as the use of public space is concerned, the lady's long-term piling of wheelchairs and garbage in front of the door is undoubtedly an abuse of the common area.
Common areas are shared by all residents, and anyone occupying these spaces should abide by the rules of the community and respect the rights of others to share.
This behavior not only violates the property law and relevant property management regulations, but also lacks basic respect and courtesy between neighbors.
Therefore, at this point, the lady's behavior is clearly wrong.
The woman's remarks revealed stereotypes of southerners, and the use of such geographical labels did not help to resolve disputes, but only exacerbated the tensions between the two sides.
The use of geography to evaluate events is not only unreasonable, but also exposes the bias and ignorance in his remarks.
Such attitudes are unacceptable in any social interaction, especially in a pluralistic modern society, and such regional biases should be severely condemned.
Although men are defending their legitimate rights, there may be excessive rhetoric in the argument.
However, in contrast, the woman's behavior is more outrageous, and the threats and curses in her remarks are clearly contrary to public order and good morals, and may also constitute an infringement on the reputation of men.
The property intervention was correct, but the way it was handled was inadequate. In such cases, the property should be more determined to enforce the community rules and, if necessary, even take legal measures to solve the problem and ensure the harmony and order of the community.
ultimately
This debate is not just about who is right and who is wrong, but about how to establish and maintain a system of rules that is fair, reasonable, and universally adhered to within the community.
Every community member should understand that their rights and freedoms are guaranteed without infringing on others.
Only under mutual respect and the legal framework can neighbourhoods be harmonious and communities truly peaceful.
What do you think?
#头条创作挑战赛#