Before reading this article, I sincerely invite you to click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also brings you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
In the midst of the recent global economic turmoil, a fierce currency war has quietly unfolded.
The protagonists are two heavyweights: the Japanese yen and the yuan.
As the yen's performance on the international stage tends to languish, there are voices shouting.
China is throwing the yen into the abyss with extreme brutality, and then secretly paving the way for the yuan. But is that really the case?
First, we need to look at this matter in terms of the direction of the global financial markets.
Historically, the yen has been one of the safe assets in Asian financial markets, but in recent years, the value of the yen has experienced sharp ups and downs in the face of successive economic challenges and policy adjustments.
Comparatively speaking, China, with its unique economic structure and policy adjustments, has shown a different monetary strategy.
Rather than simply using monetary weapons, China has strengthened the renminbi's position in the international market through a series of nuanced policy adjustments.
The Chinese government's monetary policy has always been based on prudence.
Their prudent economic means and precise internal and external regulation are very different from Japan's strategy of direct market intervention.
Although some people describe China's economic operation as "ruthless", it is more due to the precision and foresight of its policies.
For example, China's exchange rate regime is a controlled floating exchange rate system, which makes the renminbi more stable in the face of external shocks.
Against the backdrop of the eastward shift of the global economic center of gravity, the international influence of the renminbi is increasing.
At the same time, Japan's continued economic downturn and high dependence on foreign countries have limited the yen's performance in the international market.
Therefore, even if there are voices that China has "harvested" the yen, in fact it is more a natural result of the difference in monetary policies between the two countries and the reaction of international markets.
As for the statement that "the ruthlessness is 300% higher than that of Japan", we must look at it more rationally.
This statement may be more of a misreading of the market's more aggressive policy adjustments than a true portrayal of actual operations.
While maintaining the stability of the renminbi, China's policies are more focused on long-term planning and market health.
This deliberate strategy is a very different path from the "harvesting" of the yen.
In fact, China's exchange rate policy is not ruthless, but through delicate market operations and policy guidance to ensure the stability and healthy development of the country's economy.
In the international economy, the exchange rate is an important manifestation of a country's economic strength.
China is playing an increasingly important role in economic globalization, and the stability of the renminbi is not only the success of its domestic economic strategy, but also a strong support for foreign economic exchanges.
As for the yen, the Japanese government's direct intervention may have temporarily stabilized the exchange rate, but this practice may undermine market trust and be detrimental to the healthy operation of the currency in the long run.
The fundamental difference between China and Japan in terms of monetary policy also reflects the different strategic positioning of the two countries in the global economy.
Through a series of policy coordination, China has strengthened the inherent resilience of its economic system, which not only protects the domestic market, but also earns trust and respect on the international stage.
Japan, on the other hand, is trying to solve long-term economic and monetary problems through direct intervention.
This may seem effective in the short term, but it may be a bigger risk in the future.
Thus, describing China's exchange rate policy as "ruthless" or "ruthless" is a simplification and misreading of complex economic operations.
In this multipolar world economy, the monetary policy of any country does not occur in isolation, but is a comprehensive result closely related to the domestic and foreign economic environment.
China's exchange rate stabilization strategy is more based on an in-depth understanding of the overall economic situation and precise operation.
What do you have to say about this? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comment section!