When I saw the news that a town mayor was reported on the Internet, the outrageous thing is not that "there is such a thing", but that "he dares to be upright".
According to the whistleblower, at around 11 p.m. on April 26, Peng Congtao, deputy mayor of Lanqiao Town, Xi'an, called and ordered his wife to sing with him.
I'm so stunned, this is to be a deputy mayor, if he is a provincial governor, then he will have to? That must not be flipped in the morning, noon and evening. If you look closely, it's not 11 o'clock in the afternoon, it's early in the morning.
What's even more outrageous is that this incident has made the woman's husband extremely angry, and the woman also refused on the grounds of "the child has a fever", but the deputy mayor Peng Congtao still insisted that the woman go to "sing", and came directly to the door at more than 12 o'clock that night, that is, more than half an hour later.
Why don't you go?
Good fellow, this earth-shattering operation is even more infuriating than the deputy mayor himself. How can a normal person do such a thing, but you can say that he is not normal, he can be the mayor of the town.
Calling someone else's wife in the early hours of the morning to sing with him is already a great humiliation to others, but this is not enough, he has to come to the door to humiliate him in person.
It is not too much to use the word "humiliation", because after seeing the other party's husband extremely angry, the deputy mayor calmly said, "I apologize to you, don't you, then what else do you do?" Kill someone? ”
Maybe in the eyes of our audience, the lethality of these words is not so great, but in the ears of the husband in that scene, I'm afraid it's different: You are angry? It's okay, I'll apologize to you, there's nothing you can do anyway.
The arrogance of power and the disregard for the law are nothing and exposed at a glance.
Some netizens said: If you have worked in the county, you know that this is not an exaggeration.
Indeed, as he said, this kind of thing was not unheard of before, and it is the same now, if not less. But the problem was still hidden before, and it was rare to have such a situation where I can't do anything for you.
At present, the latest local response is "under investigation, let him bear whatever responsibility should be assumed." ”
But what responsibility can be held on to him? If there is no "substantial" result, it is impossible for the local authorities to impose any very strict punishment on him in order to protect their image, at most they will be removed from office or given a warning. But in that case, I guess the woman's family will not have a good time, and if she doesn't get it right, she will have to lose her job.
At that time, it will really be the end of offending the leader.
What deserves more attention than this matter is this kind of atmosphere, which is the restraint and supervision of power. However, if we are even merciful to such blatant "individual cases", we can only pale in comparison with the impact and radiation to talk about more influence and radiation.
Today, there is a very popular word on the Internet, called "curtain hearing", which refers to the president of a court who remotely controls the judge's "hard point" online through group chat and intervenes in the trial. As a result, the computer was on, and the group chat interface was blatantly placed on the desktop, which was seen by the lawyer, who took a photo and called the police, which eventually caused public opinion to rush to the hot search.
"Doing whatever you want" is of course terrible, but "blatant" further strengthens the degree.
Why do you do such a thing in the trial, and you can still be so negligent that you "forget to close"? People who do bad things for the first time must be extremely cautious, and only those who are accustomed to it will have the lowest level of negligence. This truth must be understood by everyone.
Is it scary to "hang the curtain to hear the trial"? Is it more terrible than Fu Zhenghua and Tang Yijun, who signed the legal professional qualification certificate, falling off the horse one after another?
There is absolutely no comparison at all. But one thing is clear, that is, whether it is Fu Zhenghua, Tang Yijun, or Shen Deyong, they all know that they are not doing personnel, and they must avoid the masses, don't let them know.
And the deputy mayor of the town and the remote control of the trial exposed this time are different: if you know, you know, what can you do with me?
This is an act that goes beyond the bounds of common sense, makes people more worried, and makes the problem even more terrifying.