Every spring, a "gunsmoke war" will emerge on the farmland in the northeast. Why? It's not the stubble and stubble that's at work! The old farmers pondered, wouldn't it be beautiful to burn it, which not only saved energy, but also added some "material" to the field. But the experts waved their hands again and again, saying that this matter was not so simple.
In our northeast, as soon as spring arrives, the straw in the field has become a big problem for farmers. You say that if you don't deal with this straw, you can't plant it on the ground; Deal with it, you have to toss it half to death again. So, many old farmers thought that if they burned it with a fire, it would be a hundred and it would add some fertility to the field. In their eyes, the germs and insect eggs carried on this straw can be burned with a fire, and there will be fewer pests and diseases in the coming year. Besides, the ashes left over from burning can also replenish some potassium in the ground.
But the experts just can't look past it. They say that it is easy to burn straw, but the microorganisms in the soil are suffering. These invisible little ones are good helpers of our land, helping to maintain the structure and environment of the soil. If you go down this fire, they'll die. After a long time, the soil will be compacted, the fertility will decline, and the last victim is the farmers themselves.
As for the government, it is not vegetarian. In order to encourage everyone not to burn straw, a special subsidy was also given. For example, in Heilongjiang, if you return the straw to the field, the government will pay you. This subsidy is not small, and you can get dozens of subsidies for one acre of land. In this way, farmers can also get some benefits, and the land can be protected.
However, there are still some people who think that it is good to burn straw. They say that burning straw can reduce pests and diseases, increase soil fertility and so on. But this matter, it's really public that the public is reasonable, and the mother says that the mother is reasonable. You burn straw, what about environmental pollution? The black smoke was billowing and scary to look at. Besides, what if a fire starts? It's a real headache.
Whether the straw is burned or not is really a big question. Do the experts have a point? Doesn't the peasants think it makes sense? Actually, that's not the case. This matter has to be seen from both sides: the benefits of burning are not burned, and there is a reason not to burn. The key is to find a balance that protects the environment and benefits farmers.
This straw problem is really tangled. You said that the environment can't stand it; You say don't burn it, the peasants can't stand it. Actually, it's not like there's no way to solve it. The government can increase subsidies to promote environmentally friendly straw treatment; Farmers can also try to change the traditional way of doing things. So everyone gets the benefits, so why not?
So, ah, the question of whether to burn or not to burn the straw is not a dead knot, but can be untied. As long as everyone can think about the problem from a different perspective and think more about it for each other, maybe it will be solved. Our farmland in the Northeast can also become greener and more environmentally friendly!