Loading...
The farmer's "lip-synching identification" turmoil
In the music industry, Mayday has always been a high-profile band, and their concerts are always sold-out. Recently, however, a blogger named "Farmer" has sparked a controversy about Mayday lip-syncing. Farmer, a music critic who is well-known on social media, has attracted a large number of fans with his incisive views and unique analysis. One of his accusations about lip-syncing at the Mayday concert caused an uproar among the fan base like a bombshell.
In his blog post, Farmer detailed his analysis of the audio from the Mayday concert, where he claimed to have discovered that Mayday was using pre-recorded audio tracks instead of live singing through professional audio processing software. The accusation sparked an immediate backlash from Mayday fans, who came out to defend the idol, arguing that the farmer's analysis was flawed, and some even questioned the farmer's professionalism and motives.
Fans' "out of context" counterattack
Loading...
In the face of the farmer's accusations, Mayday fans did not choose to remain silent. They quickly organized an in-depth analysis of the farmer's blog post and pointed out possible mistakes that the farmer made during the analysis.
Fans believe that Farmer did not confirm the accuracy of the sound when identifying it, which makes his conclusions unconvincing. What's more, some fans began to take to social media to personally attack the farmer, calling him a "sound faker".
The farmer was very helpless about this, and he spoke out again, trying to clarify his position. He stressed that he never said that he did not confirm the correct source when identifying Mayday lip-to, and that his concern was about similar situations that could arise in the future.
The farmer also pointed out that his video has not been deleted to this day, which is enough to prove that his analysis is based on facts. However, the backlash from fans seems to have formed an unstoppable trend, and the farmer's voice seems somewhat isolated in the midst of many doubts.
Shanghai Bureau of Culture and Tourism's "Q&A" episode
In this controversy, the Shanghai Bureau of Culture and Tourism has unfortunately become the focus. In a public Q&A, the Shanghai Bureau of Culture and Tourism mentioned the farmer's lip-synching appraisal incident, but it did not seem to fully understand the ins and outs of the incident. The farmer regretted this, arguing that the accuracy of the information was crucial when discussing the actions of "private individuals". This episode by the Shanghai Bureau of Culture and Tourism has undoubtedly added more complexity to this controversy.
Netizens' "funny comments" carnival
Loading...
In this controversy, netizens have not been idle. They made all sorts of comments on social media, some supporting the farmer, some defending Mayday, and some purely for hilariousness. One netizen commented: "This debate between the farmer and Mayday fans is even more exciting than the concert, I want to buy tickets to watch the game!" ”
Another netizen joked: "If May is innocent and false-witted, then their acting skills are too good, and they should go to make a movie!" These humorous comments not only eased the tension of the controversy, but also attracted more people to the discussion.
Controversial summary
In this controversy about Mayday lip-syncing, farmers, Mayday fans, the Shanghai Bureau of Culture and Tourism, and the majority of netizens have all played their respective roles. The farmer's accusation sparked a backlash from fans, the Shanghai Bureau of Culture and Tourism's Q&A added new variables to the incident, and the funny comments from netizens added a touch of lightness to the controversy.
It is unclear whether there will be a definitive conclusion to this controversy. But what is certain is that it has become a hot topic on social media, sparking a lot of discussion and attention. For young social media users, this is not only a debate about the authenticity of music, but also a profound reflection on freedom of expression and the authenticity of information online.