laitimes

An example that clearly illustrates why there are some people in the NBA who have good stats but not many championships

author:Reservoir vegetable soup

There are 3 teams, and to complete a test, the test is very simple, just 3 questions:

1. Dictate 1-100 - 20 points.

2. Dictate the ninety-nine multiplication table - 30 points.

3. Prove the Riemann conjecture - 50 points.

An example that clearly illustrates why there are some people in the NBA who have good stats but not many championships

Out of 100 points, 90 points are excellent, 80 points are good, 60 points are pass, and below 60 points are not qualified.

Team A, the boss is Gauss, he asked his teammates to do 1-2 questions, he went to do 3 questions, and in the end his teammates got 50 points, he got 40 points, a total of 90 points.

The result: a good team, 40 points for Gauss and 50 points for teammates.

An example that clearly illustrates why there are some people in the NBA who have good stats but not many championships

Team B, the boss is Zhongsi, he asked his teammates to do 1-2 questions, he went to do the 3rd question, and in the end his teammates got 50 points, he got 30 points, a total of 80 points.

The result: good team, 30 points for Central and Sri Lanka, 50 points for teammates.

An example that clearly illustrates why there are some people in the NBA who have good stats but not many championships

Team C, the boss is Lowss, he asked his teammates to do the 3rd question, he worked hard himself, went to do 1-2 questions, and in the end he got 50 points, and his teammates got 5 points, a total of 55 points.

The result: the team failed, with 50 points for the team and 5 points for the teammates.

An example that clearly illustrates why there are some people in the NBA who have good stats but not many championships

So, Luess went around preaching:

1. He is the most powerful person, because he scored 50 points, while Gauss only scored 40 points, and Zhongsi only scored 30 points.

Every time I put a hat on myself and shouted that I was the first person.

2. His teammates were so bad that his teammates only scored 5 points, while Gauss's teammates scored 50 points, and Zhongsi's teammates also scored 50 points. If you give him Gauss's teammates, wouldn't he be able to score 100 points? So it's still a teammate who is too bad, otherwise his team would definitely be a perfect score.

An example that clearly illustrates why there are some people in the NBA who have good stats but not many championships

Later, Bass jumped to Team D because there were a few teammates there who were very good at math. Sure enough, in Team D, Loess really succeeded.

In the first exam, his teammates not only finished the 1-2 questions, but also did part of the 3rd questions, but at this time, Lows began to make trouble, deliberately made mistakes, and finally only scored 59 points, still unqualified.

An example that clearly illustrates why there are some people in the NBA who have good stats but not many championships

So in the second exam, his teammates could only ask Lows to do 1-2 questions, they went to do the third question, and in the end Lows got another 50 points, and his teammates could get 20 points for the third question, a total score of 70 points, passed, Lows shouted, look, as long as my teammates support me with 20 points, I can pass, I am the first person, my teammates are too weak.

Later, Team D's teammates got a little sick, so Dess went back to Team C because there were 2 more top students there.

An example that clearly illustrates why there are some people in the NBA who have good stats but not many championships

And so on, Leuss jumped around multiple teams, always doing only 1-2 questions, and finally passed many times, although he never scored 90 points, he shouted again:

1. I am the first person because I can pass in multiple teams.

2. I am the longest river because I have passed more times than Gauss, although I don't have a score of 90.

3. My teammates CBA, why Gauss's teammates can always score 50 points, but my teammates can't.