If Honor of Kings launches the loser MVP without dropping stars, will you support it?
I believe that many players have this idea, hoping that Honor of Kings will launch a mechanism that will not drop stars for the loser, especially when it has experienced a losing streak but has won the MVP, it is extremely hopeful that Honor of Kings can have this mechanism.
Losing a match can be a very frustrating outcome for players, especially those who are serious and strong enough to lose the game no matter how much they play because their teammates are so poor.
If Honor of Kings has a mechanism that the MVP of the losing side does not drop stars, then for this part of the players, it can undoubtedly improve the game experience greatly, even if it fails, as long as you play carefully and play an excellent operation, the result of failure is acceptable.
And there is another advantage that the losing MVP does not lose stars, in the headwind, teammates will also strive to compete for the MVP title in order to fail without losing the star, so as to play a better performance, and it may be easier to turn the tables against the wind.
So why hasn't the official launched such a good mechanism?
In fact, if you think about it, this mechanism seems to be perfect, but in fact it has a lot of loopholes.
First of all, the MVP judgment conditions, the current NVP title of Glory of Kings can not bring any substantive effect in addition to making the record good-looking, at most it is to add a little more brave points, so players don't particularly care about who the MVP title is given.
However, if the losing MVP does not drop stars, it means that the losing MVP has a star protection card, and in the losing game, the player will be very concerned about the MVP's decision.
If a player plays seriously and also plays a good role, but the system does not determine that he is the MVP, then under the mechanism of the MVP of the losing side does not drop stars, the player's heart will definitely be very unbalanced.
For example, an old master player, who has been stealing the tower alone in the game, has dragged the game that was pushed flat for 6 minutes to 20 minutes, but in the end he still lost the game, but because his record is not good-looking, he did not get the MVP title.
If there is no mechanism for the losing MVP not to drop stars, players will not care about this situation, but with the mechanism of the losing MVP not dropping stars, I have worked so hard, but I have not been qualified to not drop stars, and my heart will definitely be unbalanced.
In the final analysis, the judgment of MVP is not accurate enough, there are too many heroes in Glory of Kings, and the mechanism of action of different heroes is also different. Even though Honor of Kings has different judging and scoring conditions for different types of heroes, it still can't be so accurate when targeting specific heroes.
It is often difficult for heroes who need to start a group to get the MVP, but it is easier for the heroes who hide output or support in the back to get the MVP, such as Sun Bin This kind of hero, no matter whether they win or lose, it is very simple to get the MVP.
Therefore, once the loser MVP does not drop stars mechanism is introduced, then the heroes who play will tend to play the heroes who are easier to get the MVP, and they will pay more attention to their KDA in the game rather than the victory of the game.
To put it simply, once there is a mechanism that the MVP of the losing side does not drop stars, then there will be more "bastards" in the game, and everyone will play heroes with strong self-protection ability and can brush damage, and will not play heroes who are controlled by opening a group, which is actually very unfavorable to the overall environment of the game.
In fact, for the MVP of the losing side, although Honor of Kings does not have a mechanism that does not drop stars, it also has compensation. The MVP of the losing side will get more brave points, and it will be easier to meet the conditions for ranking and retaining stars.