Disclaimer: The content of this article is written with authoritative sources, and the source of the literature and screenshots have been marked at the end of the article, please be aware.
U.S. Strategic Considerations: The Olympic Plan and the Crown Project
In 1945, with the end of the European theater, the United States turned to the Pacific with all its might, determined to end the war with Japan in one fell swoop. Against this background, the US military developed the "Olympic Plan" and the "Crown Plan". The goal of these two plans was very clear: to directly attack Japan's Kyushu and Honshu through large-scale landing operations, so as to directly crush the Japanese military power on the Japanese mainland.
The Olympic Program was scheduled to be launched on November 1, 1945, and was expected to be one of the largest amphibious operations in history. The primary target of the plan was the island of Kyushu, where the U.S. military planned to deploy hundreds of thousands of troops and use a large number of tanks and artillery support. To this end, the US military has mobilized a huge fleet of aircraft carriers, battleships, cruisers, destroyers, and hundreds of transport ships and landing ships. Air power has also been massively mobilized in preparation for a sustained bombardment of military installations and industrial centers on the Japanese islands in order to weaken Japan's defense capability.
This was followed by the "Crown Project", which was planned to be implemented in the spring of 1946, targeting the island of Honshu. The planned attack was larger in scale and was expected to commit more troops. Through these two plans, the US military hopes to quickly eliminate Japan's main military forces, force Japan to surrender unconditionally, and avoid further prolongation of the war and further increase in US casualties.
Both the U.S. government and the military knew that the two plans would take a heavy toll. It is estimated that the "Olympic Plan" alone may cause at least tens of thousands of casualties among the US troops, and it is even more difficult to calculate the casualties on the Japanese side. But in the circumstances of the time, this was seen as the only option to end the war. The military has taken a number of measures in terms of tactical deployment, such as strengthening night combat training, improving landing tactics, and intensifying intelligence gathering on Japanese fortifications to reduce losses in actual landing operations.
Japan's Choice: Negotiation and Seeking Soviet Help
At the end of the Pacific War in 1945, in the face of incomparably tough military pressure from the United States, the Japanese government adopted a strategy that was both cautious and tried to obtain the most favorable conditions for itself. Although the United States has made clear its position of demanding Japan's unconditional surrender, the Japanese government has not immediately capitulated, but has embarked on a series of foreign and policy maneuvers in an attempt to mitigate the serious consequences of the imminent surrender.
Japan first tried to preserve its dignity and sovereignty by proposing a way to revise the terms of surrender. Among the changes proposed by the Japanese government were to limit the length of time Allied forces could be stationed in Japan, to retain the emperor system, and to hope for less foreign interference in the political and economic structure of postwar Japan. These conditions appeared at the time as a symbol of Japan's attempt to preserve some sovereignty in the midst of its disadvantages.
At the same time, the Japanese government also began to seek the support and intervention of the Soviet Union. Since the Soviet Union had not formally declared war on Japan until early August 1945, Japan had a glimmer of hope that the Soviet Union would intervene to secure more favorable peace conditions for itself. The Japanese Foreign Ministry contacted the USSR through secret channels in an attempt to persuade the USSR to support Japan's position at the upcoming Potsdam Conference.
However, Japan's strategy has not developed as expected. The attitude of the Soviet Union towards Japan became more tough, and Stalin, upon learning of the successful test of the American atomic bomb, decided to speed up the preparations for the Soviet war against Japan in order to ensure victory in the Far East. On August 8, 1945, the Soviet Union officially declared war on Japan and quickly launched a military operation in Northeast Asia against Japan's Kwantung Army.
The drop of the atomic bomb and the turning point of the war
In the early morning of August 6, 1945, the American B-29 bomber "Enola Gay" dropped an atomic bomb called "Little Boy" over Hiroshima. The explosion of this atomic bomb produced unprecedented destructive power, and the entire city of Hiroshima was instantly covered with huge fireballs and shock waves. The heat and radiation from the explosion immediately claimed tens of thousands of lives, and buildings in Hiroshima City were almost razed to the ground, and most of the survivors suffered severe burns and radiation sickness.
Just three days later, on August 9, another American B-29 bomber, Bokska, dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki, codenamed "Fat Man". The explosion also caused heavy casualties and the destruction of the city. Due to the topography of Nagasaki, the damage caused by the explosion was blocked by some hills, but a large number of citizens were still killed or injured, and the city's functions were severely paralyzed.
On the same day that the United States dropped its second atomic bomb, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and quickly launched military operations. The Soviet Red Army marched into Japanese-controlled Manchuria and quickly launched an attack on the Kwantung Army. The Soviet Union moved surprisingly quickly, and its large military power advanced rapidly, capturing several fortresses of the Kwantung Army and causing the rapid collapse of Japan's military power in Northeast Asia.
On August 15, 1945, Japan announced its unconditional surrender through the Emperor's announcement, an act that not only shook the whole of Japan, but also marked the actual end of World War II. On this day, the voice of Emperor Hirohito spread through radio waves to every corner of Japan, telling the Japanese people that the war was over and Japan had decided to surrender. This was the first time that the emperor had delivered a speech directly to the nation via radio, and it was of epoch-making significance in both content and form.
Behind this announcement is an accumulation of intense and catastrophic events. Since the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan's war machine has become unsustainable. The damage to both cities was devastating, with a huge number of dead and injured civilians and the almost complete destruction of infrastructure. The explosion of the atomic bomb not only caused great physical damage, but also dealt a heavy blow to the Japanese government and military command.
Almost at the same time, the Soviet Union's declaration of war on Japan and its swift military action completely weakened Japan's strategic advantage. The Soviet invasion forced Japan to contend with both the threat from the north and the constant pressure from the United States in the Pacific. The rapid advance of the Soviet Red Army in Northeast Asia soon occupied an important Japanese military base in Northeast China, and the Kwantung Army suffered a fatal blow.
Under such domestic and foreign pressure, Japan's military and political leadership was forced to reconsider its strategic options. Many high-level military and government officials are beginning to realize that continued fighting will lead to the loss of more innocent civilian lives, as well as further material destruction of the country. By this time, Japan could no longer afford to sustain a long-term fight. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a direct demonstration of the devastating power of nuclear weapons, a new type of weapon that surpassed any of Japan's pre-existing defense preparations.
Long-term implications: the atomic bomb and Japan's future
In the aftermath of the world-shattering nuclear war in 1945, former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill wrote a detailed account of the U.S. dropping atomic bombs on Japan. Churchill's account is as much about understanding the complex circumstances that underwent the decisions as it was about the results. He pointed out that although the use of the atomic bomb caused enormous damage and casualties, from a broader historical perspective, this action may have somewhat avoided the more severe crisis of national secession facing Japan.
In his book, Churchill argues that without the rapid end of the war with the atomic bomb, with the intervention of the Soviet Union and the all-out Allied attack on the Japanese mainland, Japan would likely repeat the mistakes of the past, as Germany did, and be divided into East and West. In this case, the northern part of Japan could fall into the hands of the Soviet Union and the socialist regime it supported, while the southern part could be controlled by the United States and its allies, developing into a capitalist regime. This kind of split will put Japan in a state of Cold War of confrontation between the east and the west for a long time, and the reunification of the country, the harmony of the nation, and the economic development will be greatly affected.
The book goes on to explain that the dropping of the atomic bomb, although it caused immediate and great suffering, also forced the Japanese government to surrender quickly, thus effectively avoiding further Allied invasion and prolonged war. This quick way of ending the war avoided further destruction of Japan's territory and further loss of human life. At the same time, it also made it possible for Japan to rebuild quickly after the war, avoiding a long period of division and the further internal conflicts that could arise from it.
Churchill also noted that the post-war American occupation policy towards Japan was very different from the treatment of Germany. The United States took more modest reforms during the Japanese occupation, supporting Japan's re-establishment of democracy and restructuring of its economic system, rather than forcibly dividing it into different occupation zones. This strategy helped Japan keep the country intact and hastened its recovery from the ashes of war.
Churchill's analysis of this historical event in his book is not only a review of the past, but also a kind of enlightenment for the future of international relations. He stressed that while the destructive nature of atomic weapons cannot be overlooked, their potential value in averting larger conflicts and catastrophes in specific circumstances should also be taken seriously. However, this view has also sparked widespread debate among historians and moral philosophers, with some arguing that attacks on civilian targets using such devastating weapons are difficult to morally justify regardless of the outcome.
After the war, Japan's relationship with the United States quickly transformed into a cooperative relationship. Under the U.S. occupation, Japan underwent a series of important political and economic reforms, such as the rewriting of the constitution and the restructuring of the economic system. These reforms brought about significant social changes, freed militarism, and promoted the development of democratic politics and the market economy. Not only did the U.S. provide the necessary economic assistance, as part of the Marshall Plan, but it also helped Japan build a modern industrial base through technology transfer and educational exchanges.
Through close cooperation with the United States, the Japanese economy recovered and grew rapidly after the war, and by the 1960s and 1970s, Japan had developed into one of the world's economic powers. This rapid economic recovery, known as the "Japanese economic miracle," was largely due to a stable post-war political environment and effective economic policies.
Cao Weiguo. An explanation of the atomic bomb dropping on Japan at the end of World War II[J].Heilongjiang Historical Chronicles,2008(8):21-22.)