This is today's Malatang channel, thank you for your support for me, a newcomer to the headlines. I hope that friends who come will like, forward, and comment more, and wish everyone a "good year of the dragon and rolling money" in the new year.
Loading...
Recently, Wenjie released a statement to answer in detail the questions about the relevant technologies such as the inability to open the door after the collision exposed in the M7 accident in Yuncheng, Shanxi. At the same time, Tesla also had a serious accident, Zhejiang husband and wife drove Tesla down the hill and died, according to the investigation there were no brake marks at the scene, but the dash cam disappeared mysteriously! For these two accidents, the views of netizens are diametrically opposite, the whole network scolded the car owner in the car accident of the M7, and the car owner was scolded by the whole network for the Tesla car accident, which aroused widespread attention and discussion among netizens!
It is understood that in the Houping Expressway section of Shanxi Province, a new M7 Plus was driving in the inner fast lane, and unfortunately collided with the road maintenance vehicle that was working. The accident caused the car to catch fire quickly, and all the drivers and passengers were killed due to the rapid fire and the door could not be opened in time.
After the accident, AITO responded quickly and actively cooperated with the traffic police department to carry out the accident investigation. They provided all the necessary data to restore the real cause of the accident. At the same time, AITO Automobile also made it clear that it will be subject to the identification and notification of the traffic police department and handle the accident fairly.
However, after the news of the accident spread, a series of accusations and attacks on Huawei's Wenjie car appeared on the Internet. Some netizens believe that it was because Wenjie Auto exaggerated its technical level that led to this tragedy. In the face of these doubts, AITO Motors responded to relevant technical issues through official channels on May 6.
First of all, AITO clarified that the accident vehicle was equipped with a Level 2 driver assistance system, not Huawei's ADS 2.0 intelligent driving system. At the same time, at the time of the accident, the vehicle was traveling at a speed of up to 115 km/h, which exceeded the operating range of automatic emergency braking (AEB). This means that in the event of an emergency, the vehicle's automatic braking system may not be able to intervene in time to avoid a collision.
Secondly, as for the cause of the fire in the vehicle, AITO Motor said that it was due to the serious damage to the front cabin and passenger compartment due to the beam-like hard structure protruding from the rear of the road maintenance vehicle in front. A short-circuit spark from a hot component or wiring harness in the front cabin ignited the fire and quickly spread to the entire vehicle. It is worth noting that the power battery pack in the accident did not spontaneously combustion, which shows the technical strength of Wenjie Automobile in battery safety.
In addition, AITO also revealed that in the accident vehicle, except for the main driver, the co-driver and rear passengers were not wearing seat belts. Despite this, the vehicle's airbags are still fully deployed, providing some protection for the occupants. At the same time, the new M7 Plus has an automatic collision unlocking function and is equipped with mechanical door handles. In the event of a special emergency, the passenger can unlock the door opening by pulling the handle inside the mechanical door. However, in this accident, the door handle controller was unable to receive the ejection signal due to the instantaneous disconnection of the power and signal lines in the front cabin and the occupant compartment. After the window was broken, the rescuers successfully opened the door by pulling the handle in the mechanical door to carry out the rescue.
At the same time, an accident in Zhejiang Province that occurred not long ago when Tesla rushed down a mountain road has also attracted widespread attention. At the time of the accident, the vehicle was reportedly traveling at a speed of up to 120 yards and there were no brake marks at the scene. Confusingly, the dashcam data is gone. For this accident, many netizens blamed the driver for driving too fast on a mountain road.
Although these two accidents involved new energy vehicles, the views of netizens are diametrically opposed. For the car accident of the M7, the whole network is blaming the car owner, but for the Tesla car accident, the whole network is blaming the car owner. This phenomenon of double standards deserves our deep thought.
As representative companies in the field of new energy vehicles, Wenjie and Tesla have received extensive attention for their technologies and products. However, no matter what brand of vehicle it is, safety is always paramount. Drivers should obey traffic rules, control their speed reasonably, and ensure driving safety. At the same time, automakers should continue to improve the safety performance and technical level of their vehicles to provide consumers with safer and more reliable travel options.
Finally, we should maintain an objective and rational attitude towards these two accidents. While paying attention to the cause of the accident and the determination of responsibility, we should also pay attention to how to improve driving safety and vehicle safety performance. Only in this way can we jointly promote the healthy development of the new energy vehicle industry and provide people with safer and more convenient choices for travel.