Before you start reading, move your wealthy little hands to click "Follow", and you can receive more exciting pushes~ Thank you for your attention and likes!
The EU general election is in full swing Thailand's prime minister election has a turbulent undercurrent
Both regions of Europe and South-East Asia have recently taken up a political storm that has brought some new variables to the global situation. In Europe, the outcome of the EU Parliament election could bring about a major realignment of the European political map; In Southeast Asia, Thailand's prime minister election will also have a direct impact on the country's political direction. Let's take a look at these two brilliant political dramas.
One of the concerns in the current EU Parliament election is the choice of the president of the European Commission. The current chairman, Ursula von der Leyen, is likely to miss re-election. Although she pushed through some important reforms during her tenure, her pro-American policies and assertive style also caused a lot of controversy. France and Germany also have a lot of criticism about her leadership style, believing that she is too pro-American and biased in dealing with the contradictions within the EU.
In fact, during von der Leyen's tenure, the EU has experienced a number of major events. From Brexit to the Ukraine crisis to the flow of migrants, a host of issues are testing the EU's cohesion. Some argue that von der Leyen's aggressive style has not played the leadership role it should have in these crises.
And in Germany, the camp of the current Chancellor Angela Merkel has also suffered heavy losses in this election. Some of the drawbacks and problems brought about by her long stay in power are beginning to emerge, and German voters are also dissatisfied with them. If Merkel does step down, the power dynamics within the EU will also change significantly.
The outcome of the European Parliament election is bound to bring many uncertainties. Whether von der Leyen stays or Merkel is re-elected, the implications are far-reaching. As a result, the future direction of the EU will also change. We will wait and see how this political drama will end.
As far away as Southeast Asia, Thailand, the outcome of the prime minister's election will also have a significant impact on the country's political landscape. Thailand's democratic process has been faltered by a long military junta. This election is undoubtedly an important milestone in Thailand's democratization.
On the eve of the general election, the incumbent Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha suddenly stepped down, causing strong dissatisfaction among the people. Some analysts believe that this practice is a political means to control the results of the general election. Sure enough, the pro-military Pazun Democratic Party won the election.
Opposition parties are doing whatever it takes to win the prime minister's throne. The game between the two sides will further plunge the political situation in Thailand into further turmoil. We have reason to believe that the question of the ownership of Thailand's prime minister will lead to more political strife and social conflicts.
Whether in Europe or Southeast Asia, the political drama is at its climax. As bystanders, we can only hope that these countries will be able to weather the political turmoil and usher in a new era of democracy and stability.
Although the political situation is confusing, there will eventually be sunshine on the world. We hope that both the EU and Thailand will continue to move forward on the road of democracy and usher in a spring of peace and prosperity at an early date. After all, a country can only be truly strong if the people have the rights and freedoms they deserve. We are full of expectations for the future of the two regions, and we wish the tide of global peace and development will continue to flourish.
The EU supply chain bill has sparked controversy, and Macron has tried to prevent the EU from becoming a vassal of the United States
The EU's proposed "Supply Chain Due Diligence Act" has sparked heated controversy. The bill is seen as a trade barrier against China, which aims to restrict EU companies from doing business with China. French President Emmanuel Macron has made a strong statement, resolutely opposing the EU becoming a vassal of the United States and safeguarding Europe's strategic autonomy. At the same time, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's husband is engaged in gene therapy business in the United States, and she herself has signed a large vaccine purchase contract with Pfizer in the United States, which is suspected of being a transfer of interests. The controversy has once again sparked disagreements within the EU on major issues, exposing the lack of a unified position in the EU in formulating its China policy.
The EU's Supply Chain Due Diligence Act is seen as an attempt to contain Chinese companies in the global supply chain, following the example of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. This will undoubtedly exacerbate the trade friction between China and the EU and have a negative impact on bilateral economic and trade cooperation. As the largest economy in the European Union, France resolutely opposes this tilt and does not want Europe to become a tool of the United States to confront China.
Macron bluntly criticized the bill as "contrary to the principles of openness and fairness" and warned that the EU "should not become a vassal of the United States." He stressed that Europe should maintain its strategic autonomy and uphold the principle of independence in handling its relations with China, rather than being held back by the United States. Macron's statement demonstrates France's determination to safeguard the EU's independent status.
The von der Leyen family's business interests in the United States have also raised questions. Her husband's gene therapy business has significant interests in the United States, and she, as president of the European Commission, has a large contract with Pfizer to buy a large vaccine. This suspicion of a conflict of interest calls into question von der Leyen's impartiality in leading the formulation of China policy. Some commentators believe that von der Leyen may go to the United States to "retire" after leaving office, further deepening her ties with American interests.
The controversy over the "supply chain bill" reflects serious differences within the EU on China policy. On the one hand, major European powers such as France advocate independence and are unwilling to be constrained by the United States' China strategy. On the other hand, the EU's top leadership seems to be more inclined to a pro-American line and ignore the importance of EU-China economic and trade cooperation. If such differences are not properly resolved, they will inevitably undermine the EU's voice and influence in global affairs. As a responsible major country, China should uphold wise diplomacy, strive to dispel the doubts of the European side, and promote new progress in the China-EU comprehensive strategic partnership on the basis of mutual respect.
The political changes in Europe may lead to the deterioration of China-EU relations, and China should remain determined
Merkel intends to make a comeback, but is opposed by other EU countries. Some countries fear that if Merkel returns, it will exacerbate the hegemonic tendencies of Germany and France within the EU. At the same time, the pro-US stance is declining in European politics, and there is a risk that Sino-European relations may deteriorate further. In the face of this major change in Europe's political landscape, China must maintain its strategic focus and maintain its relationship with the EU through wise maneuvering.
Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel intends to make a comeback, but has been strongly opposed by the rest of the European Union. Some small countries are worried that if Merkel returns to power, it will further exacerbate the hegemonic tendencies of Germany and France within the EU. This concern is not groundless, Germany and France have always dominated the EU, showing a trend of "abduction" on many major issues.
For example, in response to the Ukraine crisis, Germany and France have repeatedly tried to speak on behalf of the entire European Union, ignoring the interests of other small countries. Once Merkel returns to power, it is highly likely that this hegemonic tendency will be exacerbated. As a result, some small EU countries have secretly joined forces to thwart Merkel's comeback plans.
The influence of pro-American positions in European politics is gradually fading. Some countries, which had previously relied heavily on the United States, are beginning to realize that doing so would seriously undermine the EU's strategic autonomy. President Macron has publicly criticized the EU for not becoming a "vassal" of the United States on the China issue.
With the decline of pro-US stance, some EU countries have begun to advocate a more independent stance on their relations with China. However, such a shift in stance could exacerbate divisions within the EU over China policy, which could lead to a new period of ice in China-EU relations.
In the face of major changes in Europe's political landscape, China must maintain its strategic focus. We should continue to pursue a mutually beneficial and win-win foreign policy, and firmly defend our core interests while respecting the EU's concerns. At the same time, we should also work to dispel the doubts of the EU and strive to establish a new type of partnership with the EU on the basis of mutual understanding.
Only through wise diplomacy can we safeguard the overall situation of China-EU relations in the midst of turmoil. As a responsible major country, China will certainly be able to contribute its wisdom and strength to the building of a new type of international relations.
Author's statement: Some of the pictures in this article are taken from the Internet and are invaded and deleted. The content is for entertainment only, no bad guidance, please establish the right values!